pith. sign in

arxiv: 0906.1593 · v1 · submitted 2009-06-06 · 💻 cs.AI · cs.LO

On Defining 'I' "I logy"

classification 💻 cs.AI cs.LO
keywords definabilitydefinitionanswernegativearisearticlecertainconcept
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Could we define I? Throughout this article we give a negative answer to this question. More exactly, we show that there is no definition for I in a certain way. But this negative answer depends on our definition of definability. Here, we try to consider sufficient generalized definition of definability. In the middle of paper a paradox will arise which makes us to modify the way we use the concept of property and definability.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.