Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Improved Constraints on Inelastic Dark Matter

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · Submitted 23 Jul 2009

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We find that inelastic dark matter with mass m > 15 GeV is excluded at the 95% confidence level by the combination of DAMA spectral information and results from other direct detection experiments.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID0907.3940 (version 2)
Pith ID7PBCGL62, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationKai Schmidt-Hoberg, Martin Wolfgang Winkler. "Improved Constraints on Inelastic Dark Matter." arXiv:0907.3940 (2009). https://pith.science/paper/7PBCGL62
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,910 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.25 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.56 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We perform an extensive study of the DAMA annual modulation data in the context of inelastic dark matter. We find that inelastic dark matter with mass m > 15 GeV is excluded at the 95% confidence level by the combination of DAMA spectral information and results from other direct detection experiments. However, at smaller m, inelastic dark matter constitutes a possible solution to the DAMA puzzle.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We perform an extensive study of the DAMA annual modulation data in the context of inelastic dark matter. contribution 0.97 0.95 0.04 asserted 0.93
s1 We find that inelastic dark matter with mass m > 15 GeV is excluded at the 95% confidence level by the combination of DAMA spectral information and results from other direct detection experiments. result 1.00 0.94 0.75 asserted 1.00
s2 However, at smaller m, inelastic dark matter constitutes a possible solution to the DAMA puzzle. result 0.68 0.73 0.16 hedged possibility 0.97

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.51 · evidence from analysis of existing data 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We perform an extensive study of the DAMA annual modulation data in the context of inelastic dark matter. We find that inelastic dark matter with mass m > 15 GeV is excluded at the 95% confidence level by the combination of DAMA spectral information and results from other direct detection experiments. However, at smaller m, inelastic dark matter constitutes a possible solution to the DAMA puzzle.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

17 arXiv papers cite this in 22 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 17 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
  • In this paper, a scan over the parameter space for iDM is performed, where we marginalize over the dark matter parameters $(m, δ, σ)$ and halo velocity parameters $(v_0, v_esc, v⃗_stream)$, and set constraints by a global $χ^2$ analysis [ref] .[In some circumstances, maximum gap techniques provide tighter limits than Poisson statistics for null experiments [ref] .

    The Poker Face of Inelastic Dark Matter: Prospects at Upcoming Direct Detection Experiments · Introduction · 0.93

Uses its data or values 1 paper
Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as background 2 papers
  • The idea that Dark Matter (DM) particles can only interact with Standard Model (SM) particles through an inelastic transition from a lighter to a heavier (excited) state was first proposed as a possible interpretation of the DAMA annual modulation signal [ref] consistent with null results from other direct detection experiments [ref] .

    Not-so-inelastic Dark Matter · Introduction · 0.96

  • Comparisons between exclusion limits on the cross section versus mass (splitting) ($σ- (δ)$) planes in the iDM scenarios by using various experimental data have been done [ref] .

    Model-Independent Identification of Inelastic WIMPs from Direct Dark Matter Detection Experiments · Introduction · 0.87

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.