Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Duality Between Spatial and Angular Shift in Optical Reflection

Optics · Submitted 24 Nov 2009

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We thus reveal the dual nature of spatial and angular shifts in optical beam reflection.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID0911.4691 (version 1)
Pith IDY5Q3XEVA, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. Aiello, J. P. Woerdman, M. Merano. "Duality Between Spatial and Angular Shift in Optical Reflection." arXiv:0911.4691 (2009). https://pith.science/paper/Y5Q3XEVA
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,924 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.20 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We report a unified representation of the spatial and angular Goos-Hanchen and Imbert-Fedorov shifts that occur when a light beam reflects from a plane interface. We thus reveal the dual nature of spatial and angular shifts in optical beam reflection. In the Goos-Hanchen case we show theoretically and experimentally that this unification naturally arises in the context of reflection from a lossy surface (e.g., a metal).

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We report a unified representation of the spatial and angular Goos-Hanchen and Imbert-Fedorov shifts that occur when a light beam reflects from a plane interface. contribution 1.00 0.94 0.39 asserted 1.00
s1 We thus reveal the dual nature of spatial and angular shifts in optical beam reflection. interpretation 0.90 0.90 0.80 asserted 1.00
s2 In the Goos-Hanchen case we show theoretically and experimentally that this unification naturally arises in the context of reflection from a lossy surface (e.g., a metal). result 0.64 0.94 0.17 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.81 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.87.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We report a unified representation of the spatial and angular Goos-Hanchen and Imbert-Fedorov shifts that occur when a light beam reflects from a plane interface. We thus reveal the dual nature of spatial and angular shifts in optical beam reflection. In the Goos-Hanchen case we show theoretically and experimentally that this unification naturally arises in the context of reflection from a lossy surface (e.g., a metal).

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.