RECORD
The coevolution of the velocity and mass functions of galaxies and dark haloes
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · Submitted 3 Mar 2010
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Our results support the simple picture that as the halo grows hierarchically, the stellar mass and the central stellar velocity dispersion grow in parallel.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We employ a bias-corrected abundance matching technique to investigate the coevolution of the LCDM dark halo mass function (HMF), the observationally derived velocity dispersion and stellar mass functions (VDF, SMF) of galaxies between z=1 and 0. We use for the first time the evolution of the VDF constrained through strong lensing statistics by Chae (2010) for galaxy-halo abundance matching studies. As a local benchmark we use a couple of z ~ 0 VDFs (a Monte-Carlo realised VDF based on SDSS DR5 and a directly measured VDF based on SDSS DR6). We then focus on connecting the VDF evolution to the HMF evolution predicted by N-body simulations and the SMF evolution constrained by galaxy surveys. On the VDF-HMF connection, we find that the local dark halo virial mass-central stellar velocity dispersion (Mvir-sigma) relation is in good agreement with the individual properties of well-studied low-redshift dark haloes, and the VDF evolution closely parallels the HMF evolution meaning little evolution in the Mvir-sigma relation. On the VDF-SMF connection, it is also likely that the stellar mass-stellar velocity dispersion (Mstar-sigma) relation evolves little taking the abundance matching results together with other independent observational results and hydrodynamic simulation results. Our results support the simple picture that as the halo grows hierarchically, the stellar mass and the central stellar velocity dispersion grow in parallel. We discuss possible implications of this parallel coevolution for galaxy formation and evolution under the LCDM paradigm.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We employ a bias-corrected abundance matching technique to investigate the coevolution of the LCDM dark halo mass function (HMF), the observationally derived velocity dispersion and stellar mass functions (VDF, SMF) of galaxies between z=1 and 0. | contribution 0.71 | 0.93 | 0.05 | asserted 0.82 |
| s1 | We use for the first time the evolution of the VDF constrained through strong lensing statistics by Chae (2010) for galaxy-halo abundance matching studies. | contribution 0.83 | 0.67 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | As a local benchmark we use a couple of z ~ 0 VDFs (a Monte-Carlo realised VDF based on SDSS DR5 and a directly measured VDF based on SDSS DR6). | method 0.99 | 0.54 | 0.02 | asserted 0.96 |
| s3 | We then focus on connecting the VDF evolution to the HMF evolution predicted by N-body simulations and the SMF evolution constrained by galaxy surveys. | contribution 0.52 | 0.66 | 0.04 | unclear 0.69 |
| s4 | On the VDF-HMF connection, we find that the local dark halo virial mass-central stellar velocity dispersion (Mvir-sigma) relation is in good agreement with the individual properties of well-studied low-redshift dark haloes, and the VDF evolution closely parallels the HMF evolution meaning little evolution in the Mvir-sigma relation. | result 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.34 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | On the VDF-SMF connection, it is also likely that the stellar mass-stellar velocity dispersion (Mstar-sigma) relation evolves little taking the abundance matching results together with other independent observational results and hydrodynamic simulation results. | result 0.87 | 0.44 | 0.15 | hedged possibility 1.00 |
| s6 | Our results support the simple picture that as the halo grows hierarchically, the stellar mass and the central stellar velocity dispersion grow in parallel. | interpretation 0.91 | 0.70 | 0.78 | asserted 0.61 |
| s7 | We discuss possible implications of this parallel coevolution for galaxy formation and evolution under the LCDM paradigm. | interpretation 0.94 | 0.47 | 0.05 | unclear 0.80 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v3
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We employ a bias-corrected abundance matching technique to investigate the coevolution of the LCDM dark halo mass function (HMF), the observationally derived velocity dispersion and stellar mass functions (VDF, SMF) of galaxies between z=1 and 0. We use for the first time the evolution of the VDF constrained through strong lensing statistics by Chae (2010) for galaxy-halo abundance matching studies. As a local benchmark we use a couple of z ~ 0 VDFs (a Monte-Carlo realised VDF based on SDSS DR5 and a directly measured VDF based on SDSS DR6). We then focus on connecting the VDF evolution to the HMF evolution predicted by N-body simulations and the SMF evolution constrained by galaxy surveys. On the VDF-HMF connection, we find that the local dark halo virial mass-central stellar velocity dispersion (Mvir-sigma) relation is in good agreement with the individual properties of well-studied low-redshift dark haloes, and the VDF evolution closely parallels the HMF evolution meaning little evolution in the Mvir-sigma relation. On the VDF-SMF connection, it is also likely that the stellar mass-stellar velocity dispersion (Mstar-sigma) relation evolves little taking the abundance matching results together with other independent observational results and hydrodynamic simulation results. Our results support the simple picture that as the halo grows hierarchically, the stellar mass and the central stellar velocity dispersion grow in parallel. We discuss possible implications of this parallel coevolution for galaxy formation and evolution under the LCDM paradigm.
Human review
How the literature uses it
What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites
What it cites · 12 sentences without a confident label
Uses data or values from 1 paper
-
By relating the maximum circular velocity to the halo virial mass using the scaling given by [ref] , we find a varying fraction from $f_sub ≈0.25$ ($≈0.18$) at $10^11$ (this mass scale corresponds to the [ref] completeness limit) to $≈0.08$ ($≈0.08$) at $10^13$ for $z=0$ ($z=1$).
Halos and galaxies in the standard cosmological model: results from the Bolshoi simulation · Connection between the observational VDF and the HMF from N-body simulations · 0.84
Compares with 1 paper
-
However, our results for less massive galaxies ($10^2.3$) give systematically higher median values of $/$ compared with the [ref] results for late-type galaxies although the estimated intrinsic scatters (not shown here) overlap.
The Kinematic Connection Between Galaxies and Dark Matter Haloes · The $$-$$ relation at $z=0$ · 1.00
Cites as support 2 papers
-
The observation that the amount of star formation (i.e. stellar mass $$) is correlated with $$ (e.g. [ref] ) is consistent with the above picture.
Constraints on the relationship between stellar mass and halo mass at low and high redshift · Implications for the $$ paradigm and galaxy evolution · 0.99
-
The observation that the amount of star formation (i.e. stellar mass $$) is correlated with $$ (e.g. [ref] ) is consistent with the above picture.
How do galaxies populate Dark Matter halos? · Implications for the $$ paradigm and galaxy evolution · 0.99
Cites as background 3 papers
-
Some recent works in the literature are focused on the connection of the HMF with the broadly measured stellar mass function (SMF) of galaxies (e.g., [ref] ).
Constraints on the relationship between stellar mass and halo mass at low and high redshift · Introduction · 0.98
-
Some recent works in the literature are focused on the connection of the HMF with the broadly measured stellar mass function (SMF) of galaxies (e.g., [ref] ).
How do galaxies populate Dark Matter halos? · Introduction · 0.98
-
Accordingly, it includes the stellar mass once the galaxy is formed.] function (HMF) over cosmic time (e.g., [ref] ).
Halos and galaxies in the standard cosmological model: results from the Bolshoi simulation · Introduction · 0.84
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.