RECORD
Can the morphology of gamma-ray emission distinguish annihilating from decaying dark matter?
Astrophysics of Galaxies · Submitted 5 Mar 2010
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Our main conclusion is that distinguishing annihilating from decaying dark matter may only be possible if the propagation parameters correspond to the most optimistic diffusion models.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The recent results from the PAMELA, ATIC, FERMI and HESS experiments have focused attention on the possible existence of high energy cosmic ray e^+ e^- that may originate from dark matter (DM) annihilations or decays in the Milky Way. Here we examine the morphology of the gamma-ray emission after propagation of the electrons generated by both annihilating and decaying dark matter models. We focus on photon energies of 1 GeV, 10 GeV, 50 GeV (relevant for the FERMI satellite) and consider different propagation parameters. Our main conclusion is that distinguishing annihilating from decaying dark matter may only be possible if the propagation parameters correspond to the most optimistic diffusion models. In addition, we point to examples where morphology can lead to an erroneous interpretation of the source injection energy.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The recent results from the PAMELA, ATIC, FERMI and HESS experiments have focused attention on the possible existence of high energy cosmic ray e^+ e^- that may originate from dark matter (DM) annihilations or decays in the Milky Way. | background 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.01 | hedged possibility 0.96 |
| s1 | Here we examine the morphology of the gamma-ray emission after propagation of the electrons generated by both annihilating and decaying dark matter models. | contribution 0.97 | 0.91 | 0.01 | asserted 0.74 |
| s2 | We focus on photon energies of 1 GeV, 10 GeV, 50 GeV (relevant for the FERMI satellite) and consider different propagation parameters. | method 0.96 | 0.77 | 0.02 | asserted 0.61 |
| s3 | Our main conclusion is that distinguishing annihilating from decaying dark matter may only be possible if the propagation parameters correspond to the most optimistic diffusion models. | result 0.71 | 0.89 | 0.99 | hedged possibility 0.99 |
| s4 | In addition, we point to examples where morphology can lead to an erroneous interpretation of the source injection energy. | result 0.76 | 0.86 | 0.02 | asserted 0.79 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The recent results from the PAMELA, ATIC, FERMI and HESS experiments have focused attention on the possible existence of high energy cosmic ray e^+ e^- that may originate from dark matter (DM) annihilations or decays in the Milky Way. Here we examine the morphology of the gamma-ray emission after propagation of the electrons generated by both annihilating and decaying dark matter models. We focus on photon energies of 1 GeV, 10 GeV, 50 GeV (relevant for the FERMI satellite) and consider different propagation parameters. Our main conclusion is that distinguishing annihilating from decaying dark matter may only be possible if the propagation parameters correspond to the most optimistic diffusion models. In addition, we point to examples where morphology can lead to an erroneous interpretation of the source injection energy.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
9 arXiv papers cite this in 10 sentences
Papers citing it · 8 sentences without a confident label
Cites it as support 1 paper
-
Starlight is brightest towards the Galactic center; together with the geometry of the Galactic cosmic-ray diffusion zone this causes the ICS dark matter signal to be elongated and aligned with the Galactic plane – in contrast to the approximately spherical prompt component of the signal, making it potentially difficult to discriminate from an ICS signal from dark matter annihilation [ref] .
Indirect Searches for Decaying Dark Matter · Inverse Compton Scattering · 0.98
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
Many efforts [ref] have been devoted to extract indirect dark matter signatures or to set limits on a large class of WIMP models by investigating the Fermi-LAT diffuse gamma-ray measurements.
Inverse Compton gamma-rays from Galactic dark matter annihilation: Anisotropy signatures · Introduction · 0.80
What it cites · 2 sentences without a confident label
Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
-
To generate these maps, we apply the propagation scheme introduced by [ref] , modified according to [ref] for primary electrons.
Cosmic Rays below Z=30 in a diffusion model: new constraints on propagation parameters · Producing gamma-ray maps · 0.99
-
To generate these maps, we apply the propagation scheme introduced by [ref] , modified according to [ref] for primary electrons.
Inverse Compton Emission from Galactic Supernova Remnants: Effect of the Interstellar Radiation Field · Producing gamma-ray maps · 0.99
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.