Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Ranked bandits in metric spaces: learning optimally diverse rankings over large document collections

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1005.5197 v2 pith:QGEFPQMO submitted 2010-05-28 cs.LG cs.DS

classification cs.LGcs.DS
keywords banditsalgorithmsapproachesdocumentformulationlearningrankedranking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Most learning to rank research has assumed that the utility of different documents is independent, which results in learned ranking functions that return redundant results. The few approaches that avoid this have rather unsatisfyingly lacked theoretical foundations, or do not scale. We present a learning-to-rank formulation that optimizes the fraction of satisfied users, with several scalable algorithms that explicitly takes document similarity and ranking context into account. Our formulation is a non-trivial common generalization of two multi-armed bandit models from the literature: "ranked bandits" (Radlinski et al., ICML 2008) and "Lipschitz bandits" (Kleinberg et al., STOC 2008). We present theoretical justifications for this approach, as well as a near-optimal algorithm. Our evaluation adds optimizations that improve empirical performance, and shows that our algorithms learn orders of magnitude more quickly than previous approaches.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools