Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Lag-luminosity relation in gamma-ray burst X-ray flares

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
R. Margutti

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena · Submitted 21 Jun 2010

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This is direct evidence that GRB X-ray flares and prompt gamma-ray pulses are produced by the same mechanism.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1006.4103 (version 1)
Pith IDDA6JWPHF, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationR. Margutti. "Lag-luminosity relation in gamma-ray burst X-ray flares." arXiv:1006.4103 (2010). https://pith.science/paper/DA6JWPHF
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,960 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.58 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In strict analogy to prompt pulses, X-ray flares observed by Swift-XRT in long Gamma-Ray Bursts define a lag-luminosity relation: L_p,iso \propto t_lag^{-0.95+/-0.23}. The lag-luminosity is proven to be a fundamental law extending 5 decades in time and 5 in energy. This is direct evidence that GRB X-ray flares and prompt gamma-ray pulses are produced by the same mechanism.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In strict analogy to prompt pulses, X-ray flares observed by Swift-XRT in long Gamma-Ray Bursts define a lag-luminosity relation: L_p,iso \propto t_lag^{-0.95+/-0.23}. result 0.99 0.77 0.48 asserted 1.00
s1 The lag-luminosity is proven to be a fundamental law extending 5 decades in time and 5 in energy. result 0.78 0.67 0.33 asserted 1.00
s2 This is direct evidence that GRB X-ray flares and prompt gamma-ray pulses are produced by the same mechanism. interpretation 1.00 0.65 0.66 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.97 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.88.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In strict analogy to prompt pulses, X-ray flares observed by Swift-XRT in long Gamma-Ray Bursts define a lag-luminosity relation: L_p,iso \propto t_lag^{-0.95+/-0.23}. The lag-luminosity is proven to be a fundamental law extending 5 decades in time and 5 in energy. This is direct evidence that GRB X-ray flares and prompt gamma-ray pulses are produced by the same mechanism.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.