Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Antiferromagnetic Order and Phase Coexistence in Antisite Disordered Double Perovskites

Strongly Correlated Electrons · Submitted 9 Sep 2010

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We discover that A and G type AF order, that is predicted in the clean limit, is actually suppressed less strongly than ferromagnetism by antisite disorder.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1009.1709 (version 1)
Pith IDWGKLJCJ3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationPinaki Majumdar, Viveka Nand Singh. "Antiferromagnetic Order and Phase Coexistence in Antisite Disordered Double Perovskites." arXiv:1009.1709 (2010). https://pith.science/paper/WGKLJCJ3
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,275 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.19 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.33 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.79 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In addition to the well known ferromagnetism, double perovskites are also expected to exhibit antiferromagnetic (AF) order driven by electron delocalisation. This has been seen in model Hamiltonian studies and confirmed via ab initio calculations. The AF phases should occur, for example, on sufficient electron doping of materials like Sr_2FeMoO_6 (SFMO) via La substitution for Sr. Clear experimental indication of such AF order is limited, possibly because of increase in antisite disorder with La doping on SFMO, although intriguing signatures of non ferromagnetic behaviour are seen. We study the survival of electronically driven antiferromagnetism in the presence of spatially correlated antisite disorder and extract the signals in magnetism and transport. We discover that A and G type AF order, that is predicted in the clean limit, is actually suppressed less strongly than ferromagnetism by antisite disorder. The AF phases are metallic, and, remarkably, more conducting that the ferromagnet for similar antisite disorder. We also highlight the phase coexistence window that connects the ferromagnetic regime to the A type antiferromagnetic phase.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In addition to the well known ferromagnetism, double perovskites are also expected to exhibit antiferromagnetic (AF) order driven by electron delocalisation. background 1.00 0.04 0.03 hedged possibility 0.85
s1 This has been seen in model Hamiltonian studies and confirmed via ab initio calculations. background 1.00 0.06 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 The AF phases should occur, for example, on sufficient electron doping of materials like Sr_2FeMoO_6 (SFMO) via La substitution for Sr. background 1.00 0.06 0.03 hedged possibility 0.57
s3 Clear experimental indication of such AF order is limited, possibly because of increase in antisite disorder with La doping on SFMO, although intriguing signatures of non ferromagnetic behaviour are seen. gap 0.83 0.10 0.03 hedged possibility 0.95
s4 We study the survival of electronically driven antiferromagnetism in the presence of spatially correlated antisite disorder and extract the signals in magnetism and transport. contribution 1.00 0.90 0.07 asserted 0.89
s5 We discover that A and G type AF order, that is predicted in the clean limit, is actually suppressed less strongly than ferromagnetism by antisite disorder. result 1.00 0.95 0.66 asserted 1.00
s6 The AF phases are metallic, and, remarkably, more conducting that the ferromagnet for similar antisite disorder. result 1.00 0.91 0.21 asserted 1.00
s7 We also highlight the phase coexistence window that connects the ferromagnetic regime to the A type antiferromagnetic phase. result 0.98 0.87 0.14 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.92 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.97.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In addition to the well known ferromagnetism, double perovskites are also expected to exhibit antiferromagnetic (AF) order driven by electron delocalisation. This has been seen in model Hamiltonian studies and confirmed via ab initio calculations. The AF phases should occur, for example, on sufficient electron doping of materials like Sr_2FeMoO_6 (SFMO) via La substitution for Sr. Clear experimental indication of such AF order is limited, possibly because of increase in antisite disorder with La doping on SFMO, although intriguing signatures of non ferromagnetic behaviour are seen. We study the survival of electronically driven antiferromagnetism in the presence of spatially correlated antisite disorder and extract the signals in magnetism and transport. We discover that A and G type AF order, that is predicted in the clean limit, is actually suppressed less strongly than ferromagnetism by antisite disorder. The AF phases are metallic, and, remarkably, more conducting that the ferromagnet for similar antisite disorder. We also highlight the phase coexistence window that connects the ferromagnetic regime to the A type antiferromagnetic phase.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.