Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Important authorship clarification for arXiv:1010.2709

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Yoav Yaffe

Algebraic Geometry · Submitted 13 Oct 2010

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Yoav Yaffe is {\em not} an author of any version of this paper, with the exception of the present clarification.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1010.2709 (version 3)
Pith ID3PYAYYWT, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationYoav Yaffe. "Important authorship clarification for arXiv:1010.2709." arXiv:1010.2709 (2010). https://pith.science/paper/3PYAYYWT
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,305 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.17 · human participants 0.18 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.02 · compares with prior results 0.04 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Version 1 of this paper (arXiv:1010.2709v1) was submitted exclusively by Noa Lavi, without prior knowledge, let alone consent, by Yoav Yaffe. Yoav Yaffe is {\em not} an author of any version of this paper, with the exception of the present clarification.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Version 1 of this paper (arXiv:1010.2709v1) was submitted exclusively by Noa Lavi, without prior knowledge, let alone consent, by Yoav Yaffe. background 0.96 0.30 0.11 asserted 1.00
s1 Yoav Yaffe is {\em not} an author of any version of this paper, with the exception of the present clarification. background 0.63 0.27 0.25 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: position or commentary 1.00 · evidence from argument 0.96.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Version 1 of this paper (arXiv:1010.2709v1) was submitted exclusively by Noa Lavi, without prior knowledge, let alone consent, by Yoav Yaffe. Yoav Yaffe is {\em not} an author of any version of this paper, with the exception of the present clarification.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.