Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Twitter mood predicts the stock market

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1010.3003 v1 pith:UPZWGVDP submitted 2010-10-14 cs.CE cs.CLcs.SIphysics.soc-ph

classification cs.CEcs.CLcs.SIphysics.soc-ph
keywords mooddjiapublicstatestimetwitteraccuracyaffect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Behavioral economics tells us that emotions can profoundly affect individual behavior and decision-making. Does this also apply to societies at large, i.e., can societies experience mood states that affect their collective decision making? By extension is the public mood correlated or even predictive of economic indicators? Here we investigate whether measurements of collective mood states derived from large-scale Twitter feeds are correlated to the value of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) over time. We analyze the text content of daily Twitter feeds by two mood tracking tools, namely OpinionFinder that measures positive vs. negative mood and Google-Profile of Mood States (GPOMS) that measures mood in terms of 6 dimensions (Calm, Alert, Sure, Vital, Kind, and Happy). We cross-validate the resulting mood time series by comparing their ability to detect the public's response to the presidential election and Thanksgiving day in 2008. A Granger causality analysis and a Self-Organizing Fuzzy Neural Network are then used to investigate the hypothesis that public mood states, as measured by the OpinionFinder and GPOMS mood time series, are predictive of changes in DJIA closing values. Our results indicate that the accuracy of DJIA predictions can be significantly improved by the inclusion of specific public mood dimensions but not others. We find an accuracy of 87.6% in predicting the daily up and down changes in the closing values of the DJIA and a reduction of the Mean Average Percentage Error by more than 6%.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Analyzing public sentiment to gauge key stock events and determine volatility in conjunction with time and options premiums

    cs.LG 2025-02 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A claim that LightGBM plus social sentiment predicts stock direction around earnings with 70.1 percent accuracy is undermined by unspecified labels, potential look-ahead bias, and no released artifacts.

Pith tools