Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Sub-$10 sound card photogate variants

Physics Education · Submitted 3 Jan 2011

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The following brief review may help teachers to pick the one that best fits their needs and possibilities.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1101.0608 (version 1)
Pith IDXRFBJ3WF, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationZoltan gingl. "Sub-$10 sound card photogate variants." arXiv:1101.0608 (2011). https://pith.science/paper/XRFBJ3WF
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,587 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.26 · human participants 0.10 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.15 · compares with prior results 0.40 · mentions code or data availability 0.07.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Recently, a simple and very low-cost photogate has been shown by Horton (Phys. Teach. 48, 615, December 2010) as an efficient experimentation tool in physics education. The photogate connects to the microphone input of a personal computer and a free software can be used to visualize the light interruptions caused by a moving object like a pendulum. Although the device works properly, there are further possibilities of improvement and similar alternatives also exist. The following brief review may help teachers to pick the one that best fits their needs and possibilities.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Recently, a simple and very low-cost photogate has been shown by Horton (Phys. Teach. 48, 615, December 2010) as an efficient experimentation tool in physics education. background 1.00 0.03 0.08 asserted 1.00
s1 The photogate connects to the microphone input of a personal computer and a free software can be used to visualize the light interruptions caused by a moving object like a pendulum. background 0.51 0.07 0.06 asserted 0.99
s2 Although the device works properly, there are further possibilities of improvement and similar alternatives also exist. gap 0.58 0.08 0.10 hedged possibility 0.53
s3 The following brief review may help teachers to pick the one that best fits their needs and possibilities. contribution 0.85 0.15 0.09 hedged possibility 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 1.00 · evidence from literature 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Recently, a simple and very low-cost photogate has been shown by Horton (Phys. Teach. 48, 615, December 2010) as an efficient experimentation tool in physics education. The photogate connects to the microphone input of a personal computer and a free software can be used to visualize the light interruptions caused by a moving object like a pendulum. Although the device works properly, there are further possibilities of improvement and similar alternatives also exist. The following brief review may help teachers to pick the one that best fits their needs and possibilities.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.