Pith. Sign in

RECORD

On dynamic monopolies of graphs with general thresholds

Combinatorics · Submitted 6 Mar 2011

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Then we obtain some lower and upper bounds for the smallest size of dynamic monopolies in graphs with different types of thresholds.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1103.1112 (version 1)
Pith IDL3C4K7DK, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationManouchehr Zaker. "On dynamic monopolies of graphs with general thresholds." arXiv:1103.1112 (2011). https://pith.science/paper/L3C4K7DK
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,030 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.13 · states quantitative result 0.48 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Let $G$ be a graph and ${\mathcal{\tau}}: V(G)\rightarrow \Bbb{N}$ be an assignment of thresholds to the vertices of $G$. A subset of vertices $D$ is said to be dynamic monopoly (or simply dynamo) if the vertices of $G$ can be partitioned into subsets $D_0, D_1,..., D_k$ such that $D_0=D$ and for any $i=1,..., k-1$ each vertex $v$ in $D_{i+1}$ has at least $t(v)$ neighbors in $D_0\cup ...\cup D_i$. Dynamic monopolies are in fact modeling the irreversible spread of influence such as disease or belief in social networks. We denote the smallest size of any dynamic monopoly of $G$, with a given threshold assignment, by $dyn(G)$. In this paper we first define the concept of a resistant subgraph and show its relationship with dynamic monopolies. Then we obtain some lower and upper bounds for the smallest size of dynamic monopolies in graphs with different types of thresholds. Next we introduce dynamo-unbounded families of graphs and prove some related results. We also define the concept of a homogenious society that is a graph with probabilistic thresholds satisfying some conditions and obtain a bound for the smallest size of its dynamos. Finally we consider dynamic monopoly of line graphs and obtain some bounds for their sizes and determine the exact values in some special cases.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Let $G$ be a graph and ${\mathcal{\tau}}: V(G)\rightarrow \Bbb{N}$ be an assignment of thresholds to the vertices of $G$. background 1.00 0.09 0.01 asserted 0.75
s1 A subset of vertices $D$ is said to be dynamic monopoly (or simply dynamo) if the vertices of $G$ can be partitioned into subsets $D_0, D_1,..., D_k$ such that $D_0=D$ and for any $i=1,..., k-1$ each vertex $v$ in $D_{i+1}$ has at least $t(v)$ neighbors in $D_0\cup ...\cup D_i$. background 0.99 0.09 0.03 asserted 0.99
s2 Dynamic monopolies are in fact modeling the irreversible spread of influence such as disease or belief in social networks. background 0.91 0.08 0.03 asserted 0.99
s3 We denote the smallest size of any dynamic monopoly of $G$, with a given threshold assignment, by $dyn(G)$. background 0.90 0.31 0.03 asserted 0.98
s4 In this paper we first define the concept of a resistant subgraph and show its relationship with dynamic monopolies. contribution 0.99 0.93 0.05 asserted 0.99
s5 Then we obtain some lower and upper bounds for the smallest size of dynamic monopolies in graphs with different types of thresholds. contribution 0.71 0.96 0.21 asserted 1.00
s6 Next we introduce dynamo-unbounded families of graphs and prove some related results. contribution 1.00 0.95 0.06 asserted 0.99
s7 We also define the concept of a homogenious society that is a graph with probabilistic thresholds satisfying some conditions and obtain a bound for the smallest size of its dynamos. contribution 0.97 0.94 0.08 asserted 1.00
s8 Finally we consider dynamic monopoly of line graphs and obtain some bounds for their sizes and determine the exact values in some special cases. contribution 0.87 0.95 0.11 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Let $G$ be a graph and ${\mathcal{\tau}}: V(G)\rightarrow \Bbb{N}$ be an assignment of thresholds to the vertices of $G$. A subset of vertices $D$ is said to be dynamic monopoly (or simply dynamo) if the vertices of $G$ can be partitioned into subsets $D_0, D_1,..., D_k$ such that $D_0=D$ and for any $i=1,..., k-1$ each vertex $v$ in $D_{i+1}$ has at least $t(v)$ neighbors in $D_0\cup ...\cup D_i$. Dynamic monopolies are in fact modeling the irreversible spread of influence such as disease or belief in social networks. We denote the smallest size of any dynamic monopoly of $G$, with a given threshold assignment, by $dyn(G)$. In this paper we first define the concept of a resistant subgraph and show its relationship with dynamic monopolies. Then we obtain some lower and upper bounds for the smallest size of dynamic monopolies in graphs with different types of thresholds. Next we introduce dynamo-unbounded families of graphs and prove some related results. We also define the concept of a homogenious society that is a graph with probabilistic thresholds satisfying some conditions and obtain a bound for the smallest size of its dynamos. Finally we consider dynamic monopoly of line graphs and obtain some bounds for their sizes and determine the exact values in some special cases.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.