Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Gaussianizing the non-Gaussian lensing convergence field I: the performance of the Gaussianization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1103.2858 v3 pith:ALVJGIXL submitted 2011-03-15 astro-ph.CO

Gaussianizing the non-Gaussian lensing convergence field I: the performance of the Gaussianization

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords gaussianizationfieldkappalensingproposedresidualtransformationconvergence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Motivated by recent works of Neyrinck et al. 2009 and Scherrer et al. 2010, we proposed a Gaussianization transform to Gaussianize the non-Gaussian lensing convergence field $\kappa$. It performs a local monotonic transformation $\kappa\rightarrow y$ pixel by pixel to make the unsmoothed one-point probability distribution function of the new variable $y$ Gaussian. We tested whether the whole $y$ field is Gaussian against N-body simulations. (1) We found that the proposed Gaussianization suppresses the non-Gaussianity by orders of magnitude, in measures of the skewness, the kurtosis, the 5th- and 6th-order cumulants of the $y$ field smoothed over various angular scales relative to that of the corresponding smoothed $\kappa$ field. The residual non-Gaussianities are often consistent with zero within the statistical errors. (2) The Gaussianization significantly suppresses the bispectrum. Furthermore, the residual scatters around zero, depending on the configuration in the Fourier space. (3) The Gaussianization works with even better performance for the 2D fields of the matter density projected over $\sim 300 \mpch$ distance interval centered at $z\in(0,2)$, which can be reconstructed from the weak lensing tomography. (4) We identified imperfectness and complexities of the proposed Gaussianization. We noticed weak residual non-Gaussianity in the $y$ field. We verified the widely used logarithmic transformation as a good approximation to the Gaussianization transformation. However, we also found noticeable deviations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.