Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Competition and cooperation in one-dimensional stepping stone models

Populations and Evolution · Submitted 13 Apr 2011

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim With range expansions of microbes in mind, we show that, even when mutualism confers a distinct selective advantage, it persists only in populations with high density and frequent migrations.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1104.2464 (version 2)
Pith IDKC6TCT4X, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDavid R. Nelson, K. S. Korolev. "Competition and cooperation in one-dimensional stepping stone models." arXiv:1104.2464 (2011). https://pith.science/paper/KC6TCT4X
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,566 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.38 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.10 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.13 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Cooperative mutualism is a major force driving evolution and sustaining ecosystems. Although the importance of spatial degrees of freedom and number fluctuations is well-known, their effects on mutualism are not fully understood. With range expansions of microbes in mind, we show that, even when mutualism confers a distinct selective advantage, it persists only in populations with high density and frequent migrations. When these parameters are reduced, mutualism is generically lost via a directed percolation process, with a phase diagram strongly influenced by an exceptional DP2 transition.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Cooperative mutualism is a major force driving evolution and sustaining ecosystems. background 1.00 0.03 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Although the importance of spatial degrees of freedom and number fluctuations is well-known, their effects on mutualism are not fully understood. gap 0.99 0.03 0.02 asserted 0.96
s2 With range expansions of microbes in mind, we show that, even when mutualism confers a distinct selective advantage, it persists only in populations with high density and frequent migrations. result 0.98 0.93 0.85 asserted 1.00
s3 When these parameters are reduced, mutualism is generically lost via a directed percolation process, with a phase diagram strongly influenced by an exceptional DP2 transition. result 1.00 0.85 0.29 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.74 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.87.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Cooperative mutualism is a major force driving evolution and sustaining ecosystems. Although the importance of spatial degrees of freedom and number fluctuations is well-known, their effects on mutualism are not fully understood. With range expansions of microbes in mind, we show that, even when mutualism confers a distinct selective advantage, it persists only in populations with high density and frequent migrations. When these parameters are reduced, mutualism is generically lost via a directed percolation process, with a phase diagram strongly influenced by an exceptional DP2 transition.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.