Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Counting spanning trees in self-similar networks by evaluating determinants

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1105.0565 v2 pith:EAWTA22Z submitted 2011-05-03 cond-mat.stat-mech

classification cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords spanningtreesnetworksdeterminantsdegreeflowersnetworknumber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Spanning trees are relevant to various aspects of networks. Generally, the number of spanning trees in a network can be obtained by computing a related determinant of the Laplacian matrix of the network. However, for a large generic network, evaluating the relevant determinant is computationally intractable. In this paper, we develop a fairly generic technique for computing determinants corresponding to self-similar networks, thereby providing a method to determine the numbers of spanning trees in networks exhibiting self-similarity. We describe the computation process with a family of networks, called $(x,y)$-flowers, which display rich behavior as observed in a large variety of real systems. The enumeration of spanning trees is based on the relationship between the determinants of submatrices of the Laplacian matrix corresponding to the $(x,y)$-flowers at different generations and is devoid of the direct laborious computation of determinants. Using the proposed method, we derive analytically the exact number of spanning trees in the $(x,y)$-flowers, on the basis of which we also obtain the entropies of the spanning trees in these networks. Moreover, to illustrate the universality of our technique, we apply it to some other self-similar networks with distinct degree distributions, and obtain explicit solutions to the numbers of spanning trees and their entropies. Finally, we compare our results for networks with the same average degree but different structural properties, such as degree distribution and fractal dimension, and uncover the effect of these topological features on the number of spanning trees.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools