Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Spin properties of a two dimensional electron system: valley degeneracy and finite thickness effects

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1106.0471 v1 pith:Y6XZY2UA submitted 2011-06-02 cond-mat.str-el

Spin properties of a two dimensional electron system: valley degeneracy and finite thickness effects

classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords electronthicknessvalleydegeneracyfinitespinspin-polarizationstls
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The spin susceptibility of a two-dimensional electron system is calculated by determining the spin-polarization dependence of the ground-state energy within the self-consistent mean-field theory of Singwi et al. (STLS). Results are presented for three different devices, viz. the Si (100) inversion layer, the AlAs quantum well, and the GaAs heterojunction-insulated gate field-effect transistor. We find a fairly good agreement with experiments for the Si (100) system, on most of the experimental density range, whereas the agreement for the AlAs and GaAs systems is less satisfactory; in all cases, however, it is vital to include the characteristic device parameters like the valley degeneracy, the finite transverse thickness, etc. Further, the STLS theory predicts an abrupt spin-polarization transition at a sufficiently low electron density irrespective of the valley degeneracy and/or the finite thickness, with the partially spin-polarized states remaining unstable. Moreover, in the Si (100) inversion layer, the spin-polarization transition is preceded by the simultaneous valley- and spin- polarization; for its zero thickness model, these transitions however grossly disagree with the recent quantum Monte Carlo simulations. This drawback of the STLS theory is traced to its inaccuracy in treating electron correlations, which in turn become more and more important as the number of independent components (spin and valley) increases.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.