Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Sherali-Adams Relaxations of Graph Isomorphism Polytopes

Combinatorics · Submitted 4 Jul 2011

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We establish that the Sherali-Adams lift & project hierarchy when applied to a graph isomorphism polytope needs Omega(n) iterations in the worst case before converging to the convex hull of integer points.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1107.0632 (version 2)
Pith IDZRVD6U3B, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationPeter N. Malkin. "Sherali-Adams Relaxations of Graph Isomorphism Polytopes." arXiv:1107.0632 (2011). https://pith.science/paper/ZRVD6U3B
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,420 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.79 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.96 · compares with prior results 0.94 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We investigate the Sherali-Adams lift & project hierarchy applied to a graph isomorphism polytope whose integer points encode the isomorphisms between two graphs. In particular, the Sherali-Adams relaxations characterize a new vertex classification algorithm for graph isomorphism, which we call the generalized vertex classification algorithm. This algorithm generalizes the classic vertex classification algorithm and generalizes the work of Tinhofer on polyhedral methods for graph automorphism testing. We establish that the Sherali-Adams lift & project hierarchy when applied to a graph isomorphism polytope needs Omega(n) iterations in the worst case before converging to the convex hull of integer points. We also show that this generalized vertex classification algorithm is also strongly related to the well-known Weisfeiler-Lehman algorithm, which we show can also be characterized in terms of the Sherali-Adams relaxations of a semi-algebraic set whose integer points encode graph isomorphisms.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We investigate the Sherali-Adams lift & project hierarchy applied to a graph isomorphism polytope whose integer points encode the isomorphisms between two graphs. contribution 0.94 0.86 0.08 asserted 0.89
s1 In particular, the Sherali-Adams relaxations characterize a new vertex classification algorithm for graph isomorphism, which we call the generalized vertex classification algorithm. result 0.53 0.90 0.34 asserted 1.00
s2 This algorithm generalizes the classic vertex classification algorithm and generalizes the work of Tinhofer on polyhedral methods for graph automorphism testing. contribution 0.48 0.46 0.10 asserted 1.00
s3 We establish that the Sherali-Adams lift & project hierarchy when applied to a graph isomorphism polytope needs Omega(n) iterations in the worst case before converging to the convex hull of integer points. result 1.00 0.94 0.47 asserted 1.00
s4 We also show that this generalized vertex classification algorithm is also strongly related to the well-known Weisfeiler-Lehman algorithm, which we show can also be characterized in terms of the Sherali-Adams relaxations of a semi-algebraic set whose integer points encode graph isomorphisms. result 0.71 0.88 0.16 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.84 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We investigate the Sherali-Adams lift & project hierarchy applied to a graph isomorphism polytope whose integer points encode the isomorphisms between two graphs. In particular, the Sherali-Adams relaxations characterize a new vertex classification algorithm for graph isomorphism, which we call the generalized vertex classification algorithm. This algorithm generalizes the classic vertex classification algorithm and generalizes the work of Tinhofer on polyhedral methods for graph automorphism testing. We establish that the Sherali-Adams lift & project hierarchy when applied to a graph isomorphism polytope needs Omega(n) iterations in the worst case before converging to the convex hull of integer points. We also show that this generalized vertex classification algorithm is also strongly related to the well-known Weisfeiler-Lehman algorithm, which we show can also be characterized in terms of the Sherali-Adams relaxations of a semi-algebraic set whose integer points encode graph isomorphisms.

Human review
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites it as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.