Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Measurement of multi-jet cross sections in proton-proton collisions at a 7 TeV center-of-mass energy

High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 11 Jul 2011

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Results on multi-jet cross sections are presented and compared to both leading-order plus parton-shower Monte Carlo predictions and to next-to-leading-order QCD calculations.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1107.2092 (version 3)
Pith IDMW2UWZX4, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationATLAS Collaboration. "Measurement of multi-jet cross sections in proton-proton collisions at a 7 TeV center-of-mass energy." arXiv:1107.2092 (2011). https://pith.science/paper/MW2UWZX4
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,921 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.13 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.52 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Inclusive multi-jet production is studied in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV, using the ATLAS detector. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 2.4 pb^-1. Results on multi-jet cross sections are presented and compared to both leading-order plus parton-shower Monte Carlo predictions and to next-to-leading-order QCD calculations.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Inclusive multi-jet production is studied in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV, using the ATLAS detector. contribution 0.82 0.92 0.05 asserted 0.99
s1 The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 2.4 pb^-1. method 1.00 0.84 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 Results on multi-jet cross sections are presented and compared to both leading-order plus parton-shower Monte Carlo predictions and to next-to-leading-order QCD calculations. result 0.89 0.88 0.39 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.96.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Inclusive multi-jet production is studied in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV, using the ATLAS detector. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 2.4 pb^-1. Results on multi-jet cross sections are presented and compared to both leading-order plus parton-shower Monte Carlo predictions and to next-to-leading-order QCD calculations.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

26 arXiv papers cite this in 45 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 1 paper

Papers citing it · 26 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 2 papers
Uses its data or values 3 papers
Compares with it 5 papers
  • In Fig. [ref] the previously described contributions are compared to data measured by the ATLAS collaboration [ref] .

    Merging NLO Multi-jet Calculations with Improved Unitarization · Dijet production at LHC · 0.98

  • For the 3/2 ratio we find very good agreement between NLO theory and the ATLAS data [ref] , except for the first bin, where the denominator is affected by the kinematic constraint and soft-radiation instability mentioned earlier.

    Four-Jet Production at the Large Hadron Collider at Next-to-Leading Order in QCD · Introduction · 0.99

  • The upper panel of Fig. [ref] shows the transverse momentum spectra of the four leading jets (according to their $p_⊥$), as predicted by , and compares the results to 7 TeV measurements from ATLAS [ref] , providing data for transverse momenta of the jets between $90 GeV$ and up to $800 GeV$ for the leading and sub-leading jet(s).

    The Alaric parton shower for hadron colliders · Inclusive jet and di-jet production · 0.90

Cites it as support 1 paper
  • Note that 's model for QCD multijet production has already successfully been validated against data from HERA [ref] , Tevatron [ref] and the LHC [ref] , what makes us confident to use a realistic background estimate throughout this study.

    Hadronically decaying color-adjoint scalars at the LHC · Simulation of signal and background events · 0.96

Cites it as background 5 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.