REVIEW 1 cited by
Revisiting the implications of CPT and unitarity for baryogenesis and leptogenesis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In the context of GUT baryogenesis models, a well-known theorem asserts that CPT conservation and the unitarity of S-matrix require that the lowest order contribution that leads to the generation of a non-zero net CP-violation via the decay of a heavy particle must be to $\mathcal{O}({\alpha_\slashed{B}}^3)$, where $\alpha_\slashed{B}$ is a baryon number (B) violating coupling. We revisit this theorem (which holds for lepton number (L) violation, and hence for leptogenesis as well) and examine its implications for models where the particle content allows the heavy particle to also decay via modes which conserve B (or L) in addition to modes which do not. We systematically expand the S-matrix order by order in B\slash L-violating couplings, and show, in such cases, that the net CP-violation is non-zero even to $\mathcal{O}({\alpha_\slashed{B}}^2)$, without actually contradicting the theorem. By replacing a B/L violating coupling (usually constrained to be small) by a relatively unconstrained B/L conserving one, our result may allow for sufficient CP violation in models where it may otherwise have been difficult to generate the observed baryon asymmetry. As an explicit application of this result, we construct a model in low-scale leptogenesis.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Asymmetric dark matter from semi-annihilation: unitarity constraints and long-lived final states
A published asymmetric dark matter mechanism from semi-annihilation is shown to violate unitarity; a corrected two-species model with long-lived final states can produce the observed relic density.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.