Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The Characteristic Polynomial of a Random Permutation Matrix at Different Points

Probability · Submitted 20 Oct 2011

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We show that the behavior at different points is independent in the limit and are asymptotically normal.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1110.4514 (version 2)
Pith ID7HYIQDE6, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDirk Zeindler, Kim Dang. "The Characteristic Polynomial of a Random Permutation Matrix at Different Points." arXiv:1110.4514 (2011). https://pith.science/paper/7HYIQDE6
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,492 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.05 · states quantitative result 0.35 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We consider the logarithm of the characteristic polynomial of random permutation matrices, evaluated on a finite set of different points. The permutations are chosen with respect to the Ewens distribution on the symmetric group. We show that the behavior at different points is independent in the limit and are asymptotically normal. Our methods enables us to study more general matrices, closely related to permutation matrices, and multiplicative class functions.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We consider the logarithm of the characteristic polynomial of random permutation matrices, evaluated on a finite set of different points. contribution 0.83 0.78 0.05 unclear 0.52
s1 The permutations are chosen with respect to the Ewens distribution on the symmetric group. method 0.91 0.35 0.02 asserted 0.97
s2 We show that the behavior at different points is independent in the limit and are asymptotically normal. result 1.00 0.95 0.85 asserted 1.00
s3 Our methods enables us to study more general matrices, closely related to permutation matrices, and multiplicative class functions. contribution 0.73 0.86 0.06 asserted 0.90

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We consider the logarithm of the characteristic polynomial of random permutation matrices, evaluated on a finite set of different points. The permutations are chosen with respect to the Ewens distribution on the symmetric group. We show that the behavior at different points is independent in the limit and are asymptotically normal. Our methods enables us to study more general matrices, closely related to permutation matrices, and multiplicative class functions.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 8 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.