Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Semi-blind Eigen-analyses of Recombination Histories Using CMB Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1110.4608 v1 pith:2AHSD66B submitted 2011-10-20 astro-ph.CO

Semi-blind Eigen-analyses of Recombination Histories Using CMB Data

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords recombinationeigenmodesmodesproberedshiftdeviationsfiducialfreeze-out
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Cosmological parameter measurements from CMB experiments such as Planck, ACTpol, SPTpol and other high resolution follow-ons fundamentally rely on the accuracy of the assumed recombination model, or one with well prescribed uncertainties. Deviations from the standard recombination history might suggest new particle physics or modified atomic physics. Here we treat possible perturbative fluctuations in the free electron fraction, $\Xe(z)$, by a semi-blind expansion in densely-packed modes in redshift. From these we construct parameter eigenmodes, which we rank order so that the lowest modes provide the most power to probe the $\Xe(z)$ with CMB measurements. Since the eigenmodes are effectively weighed by the fiducial $\Xe$ history, they are localized around the differential visibility peak, allowing for an excellent probe of hydrogen recombination, but a weaker probe of the higher redshift helium recombination and the lower redshift highly neutral freeze-out tail. We use an information-based criterion to truncate the mode hierarchy, and show that with even a few modes the method goes a long way towards morphing a fiducial older {\sc Recfast} $X_{\rm e,i} (z)$ into the new and improved {\sc CosmoRec} and {\sc HyRec} $X_{\rm e,f} (z)$ in the hydrogen recombination regime, though not well in the helium regime. Without such a correction, the derived cosmic parameters are biased. We discuss an iterative approach for updating the eigenmodes to further hone in on $X_{\rm e,f} (z)$ if large deviations are indeed found. We also introduce control parameters that downweight the attention on the visibility peak structure, e.g., focusing the eigenmode probes more strongly on the $\Xe (z)$ freeze-out tail, as would be appropriate when looking for the $\Xe$ signature of annihilating or decaying elementary particles.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    astro-ph.CO 2018-07 accept novelty 5.0

    Final Planck CMB data confirms the flat 6-parameter ΛCDM model with Ω_c h² = 0.120 ± 0.001, Ω_b h² = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, n_s = 0.965 ± 0.004, τ = 0.054 ± 0.007, H_0 = 67.4 ± 0.5 km/s/Mpc, and no strong evidence for extensions.