Pith. Sign in

RECORD

On the completeness of a family of functions in mathematical fluid dynamics

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Zhen Cui, Keke Zhang

Fluid Dynamics · Submitted 15 Dec 2011

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This note has been withdrawn.

how it is stated · asserted 0.97 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1112.3522 (version 2)
Pith IDAXD2ZL4A, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationKeke Zhang, Zhen Cui. "On the completeness of a family of functions in mathematical fluid dynamics." arXiv:1112.3522 (2011). https://pith.science/paper/AXD2ZL4A
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 1,527 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.52 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.02 · compares with prior results 0.03 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

This note has been withdrawn.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 This note has been withdrawn. limitation 0.94 0.43 0.05 asserted 0.97

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: position or commentary 0.91 · evidence from argument 0.57.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

This note has been withdrawn.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.