Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Search for double charmonium decays of the P-wave spin-triplet bottomonium states

High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 2 Mar 2012

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim No significant $\chi_{bJ}$ signal is observed in the double charmonium mass spectra, and we obtain the following upper limits, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \jpsi)<7.1\times 10^{-5}$, $2.7\times 10^{-5}$, $4.5\times 10^{-5}$, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \psp)<1.2\times 10^{-4}$, $1.7\times 10^{-5}$, $4.9\times 10^{-5}$, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \psp \psp)<3.1\times 10^{-5}$, $6.2\times 10^{-5}$, $1.6\times 10^{-5}$ for J=0, 1, and 2, respectively, at the 90% confidence level.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1203.0368 (version 3)
Pith ID4Z3JYDAU, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationThe Belle Collaboration. "Search for double charmonium decays of the P-wave spin-triplet bottomonium states." arXiv:1203.0368 (2012). https://pith.science/paper/4Z3JYDAU
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,606 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.94 · states limitation 0.57 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Using a sample of 158 million $\Upsilon(2S)$ events collected with the Belle detector, we search for the first time for double charmonium decays of the $P$-wave spin-triplet bottomonium states ($\Upsilon(2S) \to \gamma \chi_{bJ}$, $\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \jpsi$, $\jpsi \psp$, $\psp \psp$ for J=0, 1, and 2). No significant $\chi_{bJ}$ signal is observed in the double charmonium mass spectra, and we obtain the following upper limits, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \jpsi)<7.1\times 10^{-5}$, $2.7\times 10^{-5}$, $4.5\times 10^{-5}$, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \psp)<1.2\times 10^{-4}$, $1.7\times 10^{-5}$, $4.9\times 10^{-5}$, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \psp \psp)<3.1\times 10^{-5}$, $6.2\times 10^{-5}$, $1.6\times 10^{-5}$ for J=0, 1, and 2, respectively, at the 90% confidence level. These limits are significantly lower than the central values (with uncertainties of 50% to 70%) predicted using the light cone formalism but are consistent with calculations using the NRQCD factorization approach.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Using a sample of 158 million $\Upsilon(2S)$ events collected with the Belle detector, we search for the first time for double charmonium decays of the $P$-wave spin-triplet bottomonium states ($\Upsilon(2S) \to \gamma \chi_{bJ}$, $\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \jpsi$, $\jpsi \psp$, $\psp \psp$ for J=0, 1, and 2). contribution 0.82 0.96 0.04 asserted 0.85
s1 No significant $\chi_{bJ}$ signal is observed in the double charmonium mass spectra, and we obtain the following upper limits, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \jpsi)<7.1\times 10^{-5}$, $2.7\times 10^{-5}$, $4.5\times 10^{-5}$, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \psp)<1.2\times 10^{-4}$, $1.7\times 10^{-5}$, $4.9\times 10^{-5}$, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \psp \psp)<3.1\times 10^{-5}$, $6.2\times 10^{-5}$, $1.6\times 10^{-5}$ for J=0, 1, and 2, respectively, at the 90% confidence level. result 1.00 0.97 0.79 asserted 1.00
s2 These limits are significantly lower than the central values (with uncertainties of 50% to 70%) predicted using the light cone formalism but are consistent with calculations using the NRQCD factorization approach. interpretation 0.98 0.51 0.42 asserted 0.84

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.73.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Using a sample of 158 million $\Upsilon(2S)$ events collected with the Belle detector, we search for the first time for double charmonium decays of the $P$-wave spin-triplet bottomonium states ($\Upsilon(2S) \to \gamma \chi_{bJ}$, $\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \jpsi$, $\jpsi \psp$, $\psp \psp$ for J=0, 1, and 2). No significant $\chi_{bJ}$ signal is observed in the double charmonium mass spectra, and we obtain the following upper limits, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \jpsi)<7.1\times 10^{-5}$, $2.7\times 10^{-5}$, $4.5\times 10^{-5}$, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \psp)<1.2\times 10^{-4}$, $1.7\times 10^{-5}$, $4.9\times 10^{-5}$, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \psp \psp)<3.1\times 10^{-5}$, $6.2\times 10^{-5}$, $1.6\times 10^{-5}$ for J=0, 1, and 2, respectively, at the 90% confidence level. These limits are significantly lower than the central values (with uncertainties of 50% to 70%) predicted using the light cone formalism but are consistent with calculations using the NRQCD factorization approach.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

6 arXiv papers cite this in 10 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 5 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as background 3 papers

What it cites

Uses data or values from 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.