RECORD
Search for double charmonium decays of the P-wave spin-triplet bottomonium states
High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 2 Mar 2012
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim No significant $\chi_{bJ}$ signal is observed in the double charmonium mass spectra, and we obtain the following upper limits, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \jpsi)<7.1\times 10^{-5}$, $2.7\times 10^{-5}$, $4.5\times 10^{-5}$, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \psp)<1.2\times 10^{-4}$, $1.7\times 10^{-5}$, $4.9\times 10^{-5}$, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \psp \psp)<3.1\times 10^{-5}$, $6.2\times 10^{-5}$, $1.6\times 10^{-5}$ for J=0, 1, and 2, respectively, at the 90% confidence level.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Using a sample of 158 million $\Upsilon(2S)$ events collected with the Belle detector, we search for the first time for double charmonium decays of the $P$-wave spin-triplet bottomonium states ($\Upsilon(2S) \to \gamma \chi_{bJ}$, $\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \jpsi$, $\jpsi \psp$, $\psp \psp$ for J=0, 1, and 2). No significant $\chi_{bJ}$ signal is observed in the double charmonium mass spectra, and we obtain the following upper limits, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \jpsi)<7.1\times 10^{-5}$, $2.7\times 10^{-5}$, $4.5\times 10^{-5}$, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \psp)<1.2\times 10^{-4}$, $1.7\times 10^{-5}$, $4.9\times 10^{-5}$, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \psp \psp)<3.1\times 10^{-5}$, $6.2\times 10^{-5}$, $1.6\times 10^{-5}$ for J=0, 1, and 2, respectively, at the 90% confidence level. These limits are significantly lower than the central values (with uncertainties of 50% to 70%) predicted using the light cone formalism but are consistent with calculations using the NRQCD factorization approach.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Using a sample of 158 million $\Upsilon(2S)$ events collected with the Belle detector, we search for the first time for double charmonium decays of the $P$-wave spin-triplet bottomonium states ($\Upsilon(2S) \to \gamma \chi_{bJ}$, $\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \jpsi$, $\jpsi \psp$, $\psp \psp$ for J=0, 1, and 2). | contribution 0.82 | 0.96 | 0.04 | asserted 0.85 |
| s1 | No significant $\chi_{bJ}$ signal is observed in the double charmonium mass spectra, and we obtain the following upper limits, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \jpsi)<7.1\times 10^{-5}$, $2.7\times 10^{-5}$, $4.5\times 10^{-5}$, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \psp)<1.2\times 10^{-4}$, $1.7\times 10^{-5}$, $4.9\times 10^{-5}$, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \psp \psp)<3.1\times 10^{-5}$, $6.2\times 10^{-5}$, $1.6\times 10^{-5}$ for J=0, 1, and 2, respectively, at the 90% confidence level. | result 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.79 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | These limits are significantly lower than the central values (with uncertainties of 50% to 70%) predicted using the light cone formalism but are consistent with calculations using the NRQCD factorization approach. | interpretation 0.98 | 0.51 | 0.42 | asserted 0.84 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v3
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Using a sample of 158 million $\Upsilon(2S)$ events collected with the Belle detector, we search for the first time for double charmonium decays of the $P$-wave spin-triplet bottomonium states ($\Upsilon(2S) \to \gamma \chi_{bJ}$, $\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \jpsi$, $\jpsi \psp$, $\psp \psp$ for J=0, 1, and 2). No significant $\chi_{bJ}$ signal is observed in the double charmonium mass spectra, and we obtain the following upper limits, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \jpsi)<7.1\times 10^{-5}$, $2.7\times 10^{-5}$, $4.5\times 10^{-5}$, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \jpsi \psp)<1.2\times 10^{-4}$, $1.7\times 10^{-5}$, $4.9\times 10^{-5}$, $\BR(\chi_{bJ} \to \psp \psp)<3.1\times 10^{-5}$, $6.2\times 10^{-5}$, $1.6\times 10^{-5}$ for J=0, 1, and 2, respectively, at the 90% confidence level. These limits are significantly lower than the central values (with uncertainties of 50% to 70%) predicted using the light cone formalism but are consistent with calculations using the NRQCD factorization approach.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
6 arXiv papers cite this in 10 sentences
Papers citing it · 5 sentences without a confident label
Compares with it 1 paper
-
Finally, we find the theoretical predictions on the branching fractions are consistent with the upper limits measured by the Belle Collaboration [ref] .
Two-Loop QCD Corrections to C even Bottomonium Exclusive Decays to Double $J/\psi$ · Phenomenology and discussion · 0.87
Cites it as background 3 papers
-
The processes of bottomonium exclusive decay into double charmonia are interesting channels to investigate quarkonium, which have been extensively studied both in theory and experiment [ref] .
Relativistic corrections to $\Upsilon$ exclusive decay into double $S-$wave charmonia · Introduction · 0.97
-
Besides, the search for double charmonium decays of the P-wave spin-triplet bottomonium states was performed in [ref] .
Two-Loop QCD Corrections to C even Bottomonium Exclusive Decays to Double $J/\psi$ · introduction · 0.88
-
At the B-factory, there are a huge number of bottomnium states, and the bottomonium decays to charmonium pairs are now under investigation in experiment [ref] .
P-wave Quarkonium Decays to Meson Pairs · Introduction · 0.92
What it cites
Uses data or values from 1 paper
-
Comparing several theoretical calculations, the maximum values of $χ_b0$ and $χ_b2$ widths are 2.15 MeV/$c^2$ [ref] and 0.33 MeV/$c^2$ [ref] , respectively.
\ga\ga and g g decay rates for equal mass heavy quarkonia · Introduction · 0.88
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.