Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Detection and construction of an elliptic solution to the complex cubic-quintic Ginzburg-Landau equation

Pattern Formation and Solitons · Submitted 13 Apr 2012

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim On the example of the traveling wave reduction of the complex cubic-quintic Ginzburg-Landau equation (CGL5), we explain how to overcome the difficulties arising in two such methods: (i) the criterium that the sum of residues of an elliptic solution should be zero, (ii) the construction of a first order differential equation admitting the given equation as a differential consequence (subequation method).

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1204.3028 (version 1)
Pith IDLVJ6UML6, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationRobert Conte (ENS Cachan), Tuen-Wai Ng (The University of Hong Kong). "Detection and construction of an elliptic solution to the complex cubic-quintic Ginzburg-Landau equation." arXiv:1204.3028 (2012). https://pith.science/paper/LVJ6UML6
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,991 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.27 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.25 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In evolution equations for a complex amplitude, the phase obeys a much more intricate equation than the amplitude. Nevertheless, general methods should be applicable to both variables. On the example of the traveling wave reduction of the complex cubic-quintic Ginzburg-Landau equation (CGL5), we explain how to overcome the difficulties arising in two such methods: (i) the criterium that the sum of residues of an elliptic solution should be zero, (ii) the construction of a first order differential equation admitting the given equation as a differential consequence (subequation method).

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In evolution equations for a complex amplitude, the phase obeys a much more intricate equation than the amplitude. background 1.00 0.07 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 Nevertheless, general methods should be applicable to both variables. background 0.88 0.06 0.07 hedged possibility 0.60
s2 On the example of the traveling wave reduction of the complex cubic-quintic Ginzburg-Landau equation (CGL5), we explain how to overcome the difficulties arising in two such methods: (i) the criterium that the sum of residues of an elliptic solution should be zero, (ii) the construction of a first order differential equation admitting the given equation as a differential consequence (subequation method). contribution 0.90 0.86 0.46 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.67 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In evolution equations for a complex amplitude, the phase obeys a much more intricate equation than the amplitude. Nevertheless, general methods should be applicable to both variables. On the example of the traveling wave reduction of the complex cubic-quintic Ginzburg-Landau equation (CGL5), we explain how to overcome the difficulties arising in two such methods: (i) the criterium that the sum of residues of an elliptic solution should be zero, (ii) the construction of a first order differential equation admitting the given equation as a differential consequence (subequation method).

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

4 arXiv papers cite this in 9 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 8 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper

What it cites · 4 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
  • Its successive steps are [ref] : * Find the analytic structure of movable singularities (e.g., 4 families of simple poles, 2 of double poles).

    Elliptic general analytic solutions · Method to determine all elliptic and degenerate elliptic solutions · 0.92

  • In section [ref], we indicate how to correctly apply a second method (the subequation method [ref] ) to $M$ and $ψ$, in order to build a first order ODE sharing elliptic or degenerate elliptic solutions with the above third order ODEs ([ref]) and ([ref]).

    nlin.PS/0302051 · Introduction. Modulus vs. phase in amplitude equations · 0.96

Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.