Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Cosmic Microwave Background Bispectrum from the Lensing--Rees-Sciama Correlation Reexamined: Effects of Non-linear Matter Clustering

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · Submitted 17 Apr 2012

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We find that the difference between the linear and non-linear predictions is undetectable, and does not alter the contamination of the local-form primordial non-Gaussianity.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1204.3789 (version 2)
Pith IDKLLAXMEI, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationEiichiro Komatsu, Veronika Junk. "Cosmic Microwave Background Bispectrum from the Lensing--Rees-Sciama Correlation Reexamined: Effects of Non-linear Matter Clustering." arXiv:1204.3789 (2012). https://pith.science/paper/KLLAXMEI
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,183 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.50 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.22 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The bispectrum of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) generated by a correlation between a time-dependent gravitational potential and the weak gravitational lensing effect provides a direct measurement of the influence of dark energy on CMB. This bispectrum is also known to yield the most important contamination of the so-called "local-form" primordial bispectrum, which can be used to rule out all single-field inflation models. In this paper, we reexamine the effect of non-linear matter clustering on this bispectrum. We compare three different approaches: the 3rd-order perturbation theory (3PT), and two empirical fitting formulae available in the literature, finding that detailed modeling of non-linearity appears to be not very important, as most of the signal-to-noise comes from the squeezed triangle, for which the correlation in the linear regime dominates. The expected signal-to-noise ratio for an experiment dominated by the cosmic variance up to $l_{\rm max}=1500$ is about 5, which is much smaller than the previous estimates including non-linearity, but agrees with the estimates based on the linear calculation. We find that the difference between the linear and non-linear predictions is undetectable, and does not alter the contamination of the local-form primordial non-Gaussianity.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The bispectrum of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) generated by a correlation between a time-dependent gravitational potential and the weak gravitational lensing effect provides a direct measurement of the influence of dark energy on CMB. background 1.00 0.09 0.05 asserted 1.00
s1 This bispectrum is also known to yield the most important contamination of the so-called "local-form" primordial bispectrum, which can be used to rule out all single-field inflation models. background 1.00 0.05 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 In this paper, we reexamine the effect of non-linear matter clustering on this bispectrum. contribution 1.00 0.76 0.03 unclear 0.66
s3 We compare three different approaches: the 3rd-order perturbation theory (3PT), and two empirical fitting formulae available in the literature, finding that detailed modeling of non-linearity appears to be not very important, as most of the signal-to-noise comes from the squeezed triangle, for which the correlation in the linear regime dominates. method 0.49 0.95 0.47 asserted 0.94
s4 The expected signal-to-noise ratio for an experiment dominated by the cosmic variance up to $l_{\rm max}=1500$ is about 5, which is much smaller than the previous estimates including non-linearity, but agrees with the estimates based on the linear calculation. result 1.00 0.85 0.15 asserted 0.97
s5 We find that the difference between the linear and non-linear predictions is undetectable, and does not alter the contamination of the local-form primordial non-Gaussianity. result 0.87 0.96 0.70 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.74 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.82.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The bispectrum of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) generated by a correlation between a time-dependent gravitational potential and the weak gravitational lensing effect provides a direct measurement of the influence of dark energy on CMB. This bispectrum is also known to yield the most important contamination of the so-called "local-form" primordial bispectrum, which can be used to rule out all single-field inflation models. In this paper, we reexamine the effect of non-linear matter clustering on this bispectrum. We compare three different approaches: the 3rd-order perturbation theory (3PT), and two empirical fitting formulae available in the literature, finding that detailed modeling of non-linearity appears to be not very important, as most of the signal-to-noise comes from the squeezed triangle, for which the correlation in the linear regime dominates. The expected signal-to-noise ratio for an experiment dominated by the cosmic variance up to $l_{\rm max}=1500$ is about 5, which is much smaller than the previous estimates including non-linearity, but agrees with the estimates based on the linear calculation. We find that the difference between the linear and non-linear predictions is undetectable, and does not alter the contamination of the local-form primordial non-Gaussianity.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

7 arXiv papers cite this in 10 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 9 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as support 1 paper

What it cites · 31 sentences without a confident label

Contests 7 papers
Uses the method or tool of 4 papers
  • Lewis, Challinor and Hanson [ref] have shown that the sub-leading-order correction can be incorporated by simply replacing $C_l^P$ above with the lensed CMB power spectrum, $C_l$: [equation] We shall use this formula for computing the lensing-ISW (RS) bispectrum.

    The shape of the CMB lensing bispectrum · Lensing-RS Bispectrum · 0.94

  • One popular calibrated formula is due to Smith et al. [ref] , which will be called “HALOFIT.” They model the power spectrum as $P(k)=P_Q(k)+P_H(k)$, where $P_Q(k)$ is the quasi-linear 2-halo term: [equation] where $f(y)≡y/4+y^2/8$ with $y=k/k_σ$, and $α_n$, $β_n$, and $k_σ$ are free parameters which need to be determined from simulations (see Appendix C of [ref] ).

    Stable clustering, the halo model and nonlinear cosmological power spectra · Halo Model (HALOFIT) · 0.96

  • The expected signal-to-noise ratio is given by [ref] [equation] where $Δ_l_1l_2l_3=1$ if all $l$'s are different, $Δ_l_1l_2l_3=2$ if two $l$'s are equal (isosceles configuration), and $Δ_l_1l_2l_3=6$ if all $l$'s are equal (equilateral configuration).

    The Microwave Background Bispectrum, Paper I: Basic Formalism · Signal-to-noise ratio · 0.85

Uses data or values from 1 paper
Compares with 5 papers
Cites as background 4 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.