Bell inequality and common causal explanation in algebraic quantum field theory
read the original abstract
Bell inequalities, understood as constraints between classical conditional probabilities, can be derived from a set of assumptions representing a common causal explanation of classical correlations. A similar derivation, however, is not known for Bell inequalities in algebraic quantum field theories establishing constraints for the expectation of specific linear combinations of projections in a quantum state. In the paper we address the question as to whether a 'common causal justification' of these non-classical Bell inequalities is possible. We will show that although the classical notion of common causal explanation can readily be generalized for the non-classical case, the Bell inequalities used in quantum theories cannot be derived from these non-classical common causes. Just the opposite is true: for a set of correlations there can be given a non-classical common causal explanation even if they violate the Bell inequalities. This shows that the range of common causal explanations in the non-classical case is wider than that restricted by the Bell inequalities.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bell's theorem: why probability factorisation fails
Bell-type correlations are reinterpreted as sequential single-spin auto-correlations under counterfactual equivalence, explaining non-locality via state-altering measurements on undefined quantities.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.