RECORD
Geometry and Dynamics of Admissible Metrics in Measure Spaces
Dynamical Systems · Submitted 6 May 2012
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim The main result of this paper is a new discreteness criterion for the spectrum of an ergodic transformation: we prove that the spectrum is discrete if and only if the "-entropy of the averages of some (and hence any) admissible metric over fragments of its trajectory is uniformly bounded.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We study a wide class of metrics in a Lebesgue space with a standard measure, the class of so-called admissible metrics. We consider the cone of admissible metrics, introduce a special norm in it, prove compactness criteria, define the "-entropy of a measure space with an admissible metric, etc. These notions and related results are applied to the theory of transformations with invariant measure; namely, we study the asymptotic properties of orbits in the cone of admissible metrics with respect to a given transformation or a group of transformations. The main result of this paper is a new discreteness criterion for the spectrum of an ergodic transformation: we prove that the spectrum is discrete if and only if the "-entropy of the averages of some (and hence any) admissible metric over fragments of its trajectory is uniformly bounded.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We study a wide class of metrics in a Lebesgue space with a standard measure, the class of so-called admissible metrics. | contribution 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.01 | asserted 0.95 |
| s1 | We consider the cone of admissible metrics, introduce a special norm in it, prove compactness criteria, define the "-entropy of a measure space with an admissible metric, etc. | contribution 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.02 | asserted 0.99 |
| s2 | These notions and related results are applied to the theory of transformations with invariant measure; namely, we study the asymptotic properties of orbits in the cone of admissible metrics with respect to a given transformation or a group of transformations. | contribution 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.03 | asserted 0.98 |
| s3 | The main result of this paper is a new discreteness criterion for the spectrum of an ergodic transformation: we prove that the spectrum is discrete if and only if the "-entropy of the averages of some (and hence any) admissible metric over fragments of its trajectory is uniformly bounded. | result 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.99 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v3
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We study a wide class of metrics in a Lebesgue space with a standard measure, the class of so-called admissible metrics. We consider the cone of admissible metrics, introduce a special norm in it, prove compactness criteria, define the "-entropy of a measure space with an admissible metric, etc. These notions and related results are applied to the theory of transformations with invariant measure; namely, we study the asymptotic properties of orbits in the cone of admissible metrics with respect to a given transformation or a group of transformations. The main result of this paper is a new discreteness criterion for the spectrum of an ergodic transformation: we prove that the spectrum is discrete if and only if the "-entropy of the averages of some (and hence any) admissible metric over fragments of its trajectory is uniformly bounded.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.