RECORD
Population Synthesis for Symbiotic X-ray Binaries
Solar and Stellar Astrophysics · Submitted 25 May 2012
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We estimate the birthrate of SyXB as $\sim 4.1\times 10^{-5}$ yr$^{-1}$ to $ \sim 6.6\times 10^{-6}$ yr$^{-1}$ and their number in the Galaxy as $\sim$(100 -- 1000).
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Symbiotic X-ray binaries (SyXBs) comprise a rare class of low-mass X-ray binaries. We study the Galactic SyXBs, which we consider as detached binaries composed of low-mass giants and wind-fed neutron star companions, by simulation of the interaction of a magnetized neutron star (NS) with its environment and utilizing a population synthesis code. We focus mainly on the parameters that influence observational appearance of the SyXB: the donor wind velocity (vw) and the angular momentum distribution in the shell of matter settling onto NS. We estimate the birthrate of SyXB as $\sim 4.1\times 10^{-5}$ yr$^{-1}$ to $ \sim 6.6\times 10^{-6}$ yr$^{-1}$ and their number in the Galaxy as $\sim$(100 -- 1000). Assumed stellar wind velocity from cool giants is the input parameter that influences the model SyXBs population most. Among known SyXBs or candidate systems, 4U 1954+31 and IGR J16358-4724 in which NS have very long spin periods may host quasi-spherically accreting NSs. GX 1+4 has a peculiar long-term spin behaviour and it may also be a quasi-spherical wind-accreting source. We cannot identify whether there are wind-fed accretion disks in 4U 1700+24, Sct X-1, IRXS J180431.1-273932 and 2XMM J174016.0-290337.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Symbiotic X-ray binaries (SyXBs) comprise a rare class of low-mass X-ray binaries. | background 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | We study the Galactic SyXBs, which we consider as detached binaries composed of low-mass giants and wind-fed neutron star companions, by simulation of the interaction of a magnetized neutron star (NS) with its environment and utilizing a population synthesis code. | contribution 0.68 | 0.93 | 0.05 | asserted 0.99 |
| s2 | We focus mainly on the parameters that influence observational appearance of the SyXB: the donor wind velocity (vw) and the angular momentum distribution in the shell of matter settling onto NS. | contribution 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.04 | asserted 0.94 |
| s3 | We estimate the birthrate of SyXB as $\sim 4.1\times 10^{-5}$ yr$^{-1}$ to $ \sim 6.6\times 10^{-6}$ yr$^{-1}$ and their number in the Galaxy as $\sim$(100 -- 1000). | result 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.43 | asserted 0.95 |
| s4 | Assumed stellar wind velocity from cool giants is the input parameter that influences the model SyXBs population most. | result 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.24 | asserted 0.99 |
| s5 | Among known SyXBs or candidate systems, 4U 1954+31 and IGR J16358-4724 in which NS have very long spin periods may host quasi-spherically accreting NSs. | interpretation 0.63 | 0.54 | 0.06 | hedged possibility 1.00 |
| s6 | GX 1+4 has a peculiar long-term spin behaviour and it may also be a quasi-spherical wind-accreting source. | interpretation 0.67 | 0.42 | 0.04 | hedged possibility 0.99 |
| s7 | We cannot identify whether there are wind-fed accretion disks in 4U 1700+24, Sct X-1, IRXS J180431.1-273932 and 2XMM J174016.0-290337. | limitation 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.03 | asserted 0.67 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Symbiotic X-ray binaries (SyXBs) comprise a rare class of low-mass X-ray binaries. We study the Galactic SyXBs, which we consider as detached binaries composed of low-mass giants and wind-fed neutron star companions, by simulation of the interaction of a magnetized neutron star (NS) with its environment and utilizing a population synthesis code. We focus mainly on the parameters that influence observational appearance of the SyXB: the donor wind velocity (vw) and the angular momentum distribution in the shell of matter settling onto NS. We estimate the birthrate of SyXB as $\sim 4.1\times 10^{-5}$ yr$^{-1}$ to $ \sim 6.6\times 10^{-6}$ yr$^{-1}$ and their number in the Galaxy as $\sim$(100 -- 1000). Assumed stellar wind velocity from cool giants is the input parameter that influences the model SyXBs population most. Among known SyXBs or candidate systems, 4U 1954+31 and IGR J16358-4724 in which NS have very long spin periods may host quasi-spherically accreting NSs. GX 1+4 has a peculiar long-term spin behaviour and it may also be a quasi-spherical wind-accreting source. We cannot identify whether there are wind-fed accretion disks in 4U 1700+24, Sct X-1, IRXS J180431.1-273932 and 2XMM J174016.0-290337.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
4 arXiv papers cite this in 5 sentences
Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label
Contests it 1 paper
-
This observational distribution stands in clear conflict with the predictions of existing population-synthesis models (PSM) of WD SySts, which have consistently failed to reproduce the observed orbital period distribution [ref] .
Revisiting atmospheric Roche lobe overflow in symbiotic binaries · Introduction · contest 0.91
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
Generally, these are a subclass of XRB that are theorised to feature a NS accretor and a late-life giant star [ref] , although it is also theorised in rare cases that they may instead house a BH accretor [ref] .
Quiescent and Interacting Compact Remnant Binary Populations in the Space Telescope Era · Wind-fed XRBs · 0.94
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.