Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

On the Difficulty of Nearest Neighbor Search

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1206.6411 v1 pith:JZIP526E submitted 2012-06-27 cs.LG cs.DBcs.IRstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.DBcs.IRstat.ML
keywords searchdifficultynearestneighborapproximatecontrastdatameasure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Fast approximate nearest neighbor (NN) search in large databases is becoming popular. Several powerful learning-based formulations have been proposed recently. However, not much attention has been paid to a more fundamental question: how difficult is (approximate) nearest neighbor search in a given data set? And which data properties affect the difficulty of nearest neighbor search and how? This paper introduces the first concrete measure called Relative Contrast that can be used to evaluate the influence of several crucial data characteristics such as dimensionality, sparsity, and database size simultaneously in arbitrary normed metric spaces. Moreover, we present a theoretical analysis to prove how the difficulty measure (relative contrast) determines/affects the complexity of Local Sensitive Hashing, a popular approximate NN search method. Relative contrast also provides an explanation for a family of heuristic hashing algorithms with good practical performance based on PCA. Finally, we show that most of the previous works in measuring NN search meaningfulness/difficulty can be derived as special asymptotic cases for dense vectors of the proposed measure.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Graph-Based Vector Search: An Experimental Evaluation of the State-of-the-Art

    cs.IR 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An evaluation of twelve graph-based vector search methods on up to one billion vectors shows that incremental insertion and neighborhood diversification are the design choices that scale best.

  2. Toward Efficient and Scalable Design of In-Memory Graph-Based Vector Search

    cs.IR 2025-09 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    In head-to-head tests on up to one billion vectors, graph-based vector search methods that use incremental insertion and neighborhood diversification (especially RND and MOND) beat propagation- and most divide-and-con...

Pith tools