Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Information-Theoretical Learning of Discriminative Clusters for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1206.6438 v1 pith:3HAEOBT3 submitted 2012-06-27 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords domaintargetadaptationclassifiersdatafeaturelabeledlearn
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the problem of unsupervised domain adaptation, which aims to adapt classifiers trained on a labeled source domain to an unlabeled target domain. Many existing approaches first learn domain-invariant features and then construct classifiers with them. We propose a novel approach that jointly learn the both. Specifically, while the method identifies a feature space where data in the source and the target domains are similarly distributed, it also learns the feature space discriminatively, optimizing an information-theoretic metric as an proxy to the expected misclassification error on the target domain. We show how this optimization can be effectively carried out with simple gradient-based methods and how hyperparameters can be cross-validated without demanding any labeled data from the target domain. Empirical studies on benchmark tasks of object recognition and sentiment analysis validated our modeling assumptions and demonstrated significant improvement of our method over competing ones in classification accuracies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Consensus-Driven Active Model Selection

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    CODA uses consensus-based priors and Bayesian updating to select the best candidate model with far fewer labels than prior active model selection methods, beating them on 18 of 26 benchmark tasks.

Pith tools