Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Search for Low Mass Higgs Boson at the Tevatron

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Pierluigi Totaro (for the CDF, D0 Collaborations)

High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 20 Sep 2012

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim A summary of the latest results from the CDF and D0 collaborations is reported in this paper, focusing in particular on ongoing efforts to increase overall search sensitivity through improvements to the analysis methods.

how it is stated · asserted 0.94 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1209.4577 (version 1)
Pith ID6TUIRMQS, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationD0 Collaborations), Pierluigi Totaro (for the CDF. "Search for Low Mass Higgs Boson at the Tevatron." arXiv:1209.4577 (2012). https://pith.science/paper/6TUIRMQS
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,380 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.20 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.23 · compares with prior results 0.19 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present the current status of searches for a low mass Standard Model Higgs boson (M_H below ~ 135 GeV/c^2) using data collected from ppbar collisions at the Fermilab Tevatron collider at \sqrt{s}= 1.96 TeV. A summary of the latest results from the CDF and D0 collaborations is reported in this paper, focusing in particular on ongoing efforts to increase overall search sensitivity through improvements to the analysis methods.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present the current status of searches for a low mass Standard Model Higgs boson (M_H below ~ 135 GeV/c^2) using data collected from ppbar collisions at the Fermilab Tevatron collider at \sqrt{s}= 1.96 TeV. contribution 0.92 0.36 0.07 asserted 0.84
s1 A summary of the latest results from the CDF and D0 collaborations is reported in this paper, focusing in particular on ongoing efforts to increase overall search sensitivity through improvements to the analysis methods. contribution 0.99 0.37 0.11 asserted 0.94

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 0.69 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.88.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present the current status of searches for a low mass Standard Model Higgs boson (M_H below ~ 135 GeV/c^2) using data collected from ppbar collisions at the Fermilab Tevatron collider at \sqrt{s}= 1.96 TeV. A summary of the latest results from the CDF and D0 collaborations is reported in this paper, focusing in particular on ongoing efforts to increase overall search sensitivity through improvements to the analysis methods.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 2 sentences without a confident label

Uses data or values from 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.