Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The faster the narrower: characteristic bulk velocities and jet opening angles of Gamma Ray Bursts

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena · Submitted 3 Oct 2012

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim On average, larger values of Gamma_0 (i.e. the "faster" bursts) correspond to smaller values of theta_jet (i.e. the "narrower").

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1210.1215 (version 1)
Pith IDVD7LKLI3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
Citation(2) INAF-IASF Milano, (3) APC - Paris, (4) Sydney Institute for Astronomy), A. Melandri (1) ((1) INAF-Osservatorio Brera, D. Burlon (4), G. Ghirlanda (1), G. Ghisellini (1), G. Tagliaferri (1), L. Nava (3), P. D'Avanzo (1), R. Salvaterra (2), S. Campana (1). "The faster the narrower: characteristic bulk velocities and jet opening angles of Gamma Ray Bursts." arXiv:1210.1215 (2012). https://pith.science/paper/VD7LKLI3
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,314 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.54 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.49 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The jet opening angle theta_jet and the bulk Lorentz factor Gamma_0 are crucial parameters for the computation of the energetics of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs). From the ~30 GRBs with measured theta_jet or Gamma_0 it is known that: (i) the real energetic E_gamma, obtained by correcting the isotropic equivalent energy E_iso for the collimation factor ~theta_jet^2, is clustered around 10^50-10^51 erg and it is correlated with the peak energy E_p of the prompt emission and (ii) the comoving frame E'_p and E'_gamma are clustered around typical values. Current estimates of Gamma_0 and theta_jet are based on incomplete data samples and their observed distributions could be subject to biases. Through a population synthesis code we investigate whether different assumed intrinsic distributions of Gamma_0 and theta_jet can reproduce a set of observational constraints. Assuming that all bursts have the same E'_p and E'_gamma in the comoving frame, we find that Gamma_0 and theta_jet cannot be distributed as single power-laws. The best agreement between our simulation and the available data is obtained assuming (a) log-normal distributions for theta_jet and Gamma_0 and (b) an intrinsic relation between the peak values of their distributions, i.e theta_jet^2.5*Gamma_0=const. On average, larger values of Gamma_0 (i.e. the "faster" bursts) correspond to smaller values of theta_jet (i.e. the "narrower"). We predict that ~6% of the bursts that point to us should not show any jet break in their afterglow light curve since they have sin(theta_jet)<1/Gamma_0. Finally, we estimate that the local rate of GRBs is ~0.3% of all local SNIb/c and ~4.3% of local hypernovae, i.e. SNIb/c with broad-lines.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The jet opening angle theta_jet and the bulk Lorentz factor Gamma_0 are crucial parameters for the computation of the energetics of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs). background 1.00 0.05 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 From the ~30 GRBs with measured theta_jet or Gamma_0 it is known that: (i) the real energetic E_gamma, obtained by correcting the isotropic equivalent energy E_iso for the collimation factor ~theta_jet^2, is clustered around 10^50-10^51 erg and it is correlated with the peak energy E_p of the prompt emission and (ii) the comoving frame E'_p and E'_gamma are clustered around typical values. background 0.98 0.08 0.06 asserted 1.00
s2 Current estimates of Gamma_0 and theta_jet are based on incomplete data samples and their observed distributions could be subject to biases. gap 0.76 0.08 0.02 hedged possibility 0.85
s3 Through a population synthesis code we investigate whether different assumed intrinsic distributions of Gamma_0 and theta_jet can reproduce a set of observational constraints. method 0.65 0.80 0.03 asserted 0.65
s4 Assuming that all bursts have the same E'_p and E'_gamma in the comoving frame, we find that Gamma_0 and theta_jet cannot be distributed as single power-laws. result 1.00 0.95 0.10 asserted 1.00
s5 The best agreement between our simulation and the available data is obtained assuming (a) log-normal distributions for theta_jet and Gamma_0 and (b) an intrinsic relation between the peak values of their distributions, i.e theta_jet^2.5*Gamma_0=const. result 1.00 0.95 0.52 asserted 1.00
s6 On average, larger values of Gamma_0 (i.e. the "faster" bursts) correspond to smaller values of theta_jet (i.e. the "narrower"). result 0.88 0.89 0.77 asserted 0.99
s7 We predict that ~6% of the bursts that point to us should not show any jet break in their afterglow light curve since they have sin(theta_jet)<1/Gamma_0. result 0.95 0.89 0.07 asserted 0.80
s8 Finally, we estimate that the local rate of GRBs is ~0.3% of all local SNIb/c and ~4.3% of local hypernovae, i.e. SNIb/c with broad-lines. result 1.00 0.89 0.05 asserted 0.94

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The jet opening angle theta_jet and the bulk Lorentz factor Gamma_0 are crucial parameters for the computation of the energetics of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs). From the ~30 GRBs with measured theta_jet or Gamma_0 it is known that: (i) the real energetic E_gamma, obtained by correcting the isotropic equivalent energy E_iso for the collimation factor ~theta_jet^2, is clustered around 10^50-10^51 erg and it is correlated with the peak energy E_p of the prompt emission and (ii) the comoving frame E'_p and E'_gamma are clustered around typical values. Current estimates of Gamma_0 and theta_jet are based on incomplete data samples and their observed distributions could be subject to biases. Through a population synthesis code we investigate whether different assumed intrinsic distributions of Gamma_0 and theta_jet can reproduce a set of observational constraints. Assuming that all bursts have the same E'_p and E'_gamma in the comoving frame, we find that Gamma_0 and theta_jet cannot be distributed as single power-laws. The best agreement between our simulation and the available data is obtained assuming (a) log-normal distributions for theta_jet and Gamma_0 and (b) an intrinsic relation between the peak values of their distributions, i.e theta_jet^2.5*Gamma_0=const. On average, larger values of Gamma_0 (i.e. the "faster" bursts) correspond to smaller values of theta_jet (i.e. the "narrower"). We predict that ~6% of the bursts that point to us should not show any jet break in their afterglow light curve since they have sin(theta_jet)<1/Gamma_0. Finally, we estimate that the local rate of GRBs is ~0.3% of all local SNIb/c and ~4.3% of local hypernovae, i.e. SNIb/c with broad-lines.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 5 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 4 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.