Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The rates and time-delay distribution of multiply imaged supernovae behind lensing clusters

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · Submitted 29 Oct 2012

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We find that for time delays less than 1000 days, at z=3.0, their logarithmic probability distribution functions are well represented by P (log \Delta t)=5.3 x 10^-4 \Delta t^\beta M_250^-2\beta, with \beta=0.77, where M_250 is the projected cluster mass inside 250 kpc (in 10^14 M_sun), and \beta is the power-law slope of the distribution.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1210.7681 (version 1)
Pith ID5NBTWOQ6, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJens Hjorth, Johan Richard, Xue Li. "The rates and time-delay distribution of multiply imaged supernovae behind lensing clusters." arXiv:1210.7681 (2012). https://pith.science/paper/5NBTWOQ6
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,003 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.19 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.09 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Time delays of gravitationally lensed sources can be used to constrain the mass model of a deflector and determine cosmological parameters. We here present an analysis of the time-delay distribution of multiply imaged sources behind 17 strong lensing galaxy clusters with well-calibrated mass models. We find that for time delays less than 1000 days, at z=3.0, their logarithmic probability distribution functions are well represented by P (log \Delta t)=5.3 x 10^-4 \Delta t^\beta M_250^-2\beta, with \beta=0.77, where M_250 is the projected cluster mass inside 250 kpc (in 10^14 M_sun), and \beta is the power-law slope of the distribution. The resultant probability distribution function enables us to estimate the time-delay distribution in a lensing cluster of known mass. For a cluster with M_250=2 x 10^14 M_sun, the fraction of time delays less than 1000 days is approximately 3%. Taking Abell 1689 as an example, its dark halo and brightest galaxies, with central velocity dispersions larger than 500 km/s, mainly produce large time delays, while galaxy-scale mass clumps are responsible for generating smaller time delays. We estimate the probability of observing multiple images of a supernova in the known images of Abell 1689. A two-component model of estimating the supernova rate is applied in this work. For a magnitude threshold of m_AB=26.5, the yearly rate of Type Ia (core-collapse) supernovae with time delays less than 1000 days is 0.004 +- 0.002 (0.029 +- 0.001). If the magnitude threshold is lowered to m_AB ~ 27.0, the rate of core-collapse supernovae suitable for time delay observation is 0.044 +- 0.015 per year.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Time delays of gravitationally lensed sources can be used to constrain the mass model of a deflector and determine cosmological parameters. background 1.00 0.04 0.04 asserted 0.63
s1 We here present an analysis of the time-delay distribution of multiply imaged sources behind 17 strong lensing galaxy clusters with well-calibrated mass models. contribution 0.99 0.94 0.06 asserted 0.91
s2 We find that for time delays less than 1000 days, at z=3.0, their logarithmic probability distribution functions are well represented by P (log \Delta t)=5.3 x 10^-4 \Delta t^\beta M_250^-2\beta, with \beta=0.77, where M_250 is the projected cluster mass inside 250 kpc (in 10^14 M_sun), and \beta is the power-law slope of the distribution. result 1.00 0.96 0.53 asserted 1.00
s3 The resultant probability distribution function enables us to estimate the time-delay distribution in a lensing cluster of known mass. interpretation 0.68 0.73 0.13 asserted 0.82
s4 For a cluster with M_250=2 x 10^14 M_sun, the fraction of time delays less than 1000 days is approximately 3%. result 1.00 0.89 0.09 asserted 0.91
s5 Taking Abell 1689 as an example, its dark halo and brightest galaxies, with central velocity dispersions larger than 500 km/s, mainly produce large time delays, while galaxy-scale mass clumps are responsible for generating smaller time delays. interpretation 0.70 0.79 0.08 asserted 0.99
s6 We estimate the probability of observing multiple images of a supernova in the known images of Abell 1689. contribution 0.86 0.92 0.04 asserted 0.89
s7 A two-component model of estimating the supernova rate is applied in this work. method 0.98 0.82 0.03 asserted 0.98
s8 For a magnitude threshold of m_AB=26.5, the yearly rate of Type Ia (core-collapse) supernovae with time delays less than 1000 days is 0.004 +- 0.002 (0.029 +- 0.001). result 1.00 0.92 0.16 asserted 1.00
s9 If the magnitude threshold is lowered to m_AB ~ 27.0, the rate of core-collapse supernovae suitable for time delay observation is 0.044 +- 0.015 per year. result 1.00 0.89 0.12 asserted 0.97

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.74 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Time delays of gravitationally lensed sources can be used to constrain the mass model of a deflector and determine cosmological parameters. We here present an analysis of the time-delay distribution of multiply imaged sources behind 17 strong lensing galaxy clusters with well-calibrated mass models. We find that for time delays less than 1000 days, at z=3.0, their logarithmic probability distribution functions are well represented by P (log \Delta t)=5.3 x 10^-4 \Delta t^\beta M_250^-2\beta, with \beta=0.77, where M_250 is the projected cluster mass inside 250 kpc (in 10^14 M_sun), and \beta is the power-law slope of the distribution. The resultant probability distribution function enables us to estimate the time-delay distribution in a lensing cluster of known mass. For a cluster with M_250=2 x 10^14 M_sun, the fraction of time delays less than 1000 days is approximately 3%. Taking Abell 1689 as an example, its dark halo and brightest galaxies, with central velocity dispersions larger than 500 km/s, mainly produce large time delays, while galaxy-scale mass clumps are responsible for generating smaller time delays. We estimate the probability of observing multiple images of a supernova in the known images of Abell 1689. A two-component model of estimating the supernova rate is applied in this work. For a magnitude threshold of m_AB=26.5, the yearly rate of Type Ia (core-collapse) supernovae with time delays less than 1000 days is 0.004 +- 0.002 (0.029 +- 0.001). If the magnitude threshold is lowered to m_AB ~ 27.0, the rate of core-collapse supernovae suitable for time delay observation is 0.044 +- 0.015 per year.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 12 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
Uses data or values from 3 papers
Compares with 1 paper
Cites as background 11 papers
  • There are several theoretical profiles established to describe the mass distribution of a cluster: the SIS profile, the dPIE profile (dual pseudo isothermal elliptical profile) [ref] , and the NFW profile (Navarro-Frenk-White profile) [ref] , etc.

    Where is the matter in the Merging Cluster Abell 2218? · Time delay theory · 0.97

  • So far, time delays have been studied and applied in many ways: to constrain the Hubble parameter $H_0$ [ref] [ref] [ref] ; to study the galaxy mass profile with Monte Carlo simulations [ref] ; to measure the cosmological parameter $w$ [ref] [ref] [ref] [ref] [ref] ; to improve the mass models of galaxies with the time delays of quasars [ref] .

    Two accurate time-delay distances from strong lensing: Implications for cosmology · Introduction · 0.82

  • So far, time delays have been studied and applied in many ways: to constrain the Hubble parameter $H_0$ [ref] [ref] [ref] ; to study the galaxy mass profile with Monte Carlo simulations [ref] ; to measure the cosmological parameter $w$ [ref] [ref] [ref] [ref] [ref] ; to improve the mass models of galaxies with the time delays of quasars [ref] .

    Cosmological Constraints from Gravitational Lens Time Delays · Introduction · 0.82

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.