Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Estimation of the neutrino flux and resulting constraints on hadronic emission models for Cyg X-3 using AGILE data

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena · Submitted 6 Dec 2012

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Using the correlation of AGILE data on the flaring episodes in 2009 June and July to the hypersoft X-ray state we calculate that the upper limits on the neutrino flux given by IceCube are starting to constrain the hadronic models, which have been introduced to interpret the high-energy emission detected by AGILE.

how it is stated · asserted 0.95 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1212.1457 (version 3)
Pith IDCQ6XM5LR, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDafne Guetta, Philipp Baerwald. "Estimation of the neutrino flux and resulting constraints on hadronic emission models for Cyg X-3 using AGILE data." arXiv:1212.1457 (2012). https://pith.science/paper/CQ6XM5LR
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,478 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.60 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.09 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.34 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this work we give an estimate of the neutrino flux that can be expected from the microquasar Cyg X-3. We calculate the muon neutrino flux expected here on Earth as well as the corresponding number of neutrino events in the IceCube telescope based on the so-called hypersoft X-ray state of Cyg~X-3. If the average emission from Cyg~X-3 over a period of 5 yr were as high as during the used X-ray state, a total of 0.8 events should be observed by the full IceCube telescope. We also show that this conclusion holds by a factor of a few when we consider the other measured X-ray states. Using the correlation of AGILE data on the flaring episodes in 2009 June and July to the hypersoft X-ray state we calculate that the upper limits on the neutrino flux given by IceCube are starting to constrain the hadronic models, which have been introduced to interpret the high-energy emission detected by AGILE.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this work we give an estimate of the neutrino flux that can be expected from the microquasar Cyg X-3. contribution 1.00 0.92 0.06 asserted 0.91
s1 We calculate the muon neutrino flux expected here on Earth as well as the corresponding number of neutrino events in the IceCube telescope based on the so-called hypersoft X-ray state of Cyg~X-3. contribution 0.56 0.93 0.08 asserted 1.00
s2 If the average emission from Cyg~X-3 over a period of 5 yr were as high as during the used X-ray state, a total of 0.8 events should be observed by the full IceCube telescope. result 1.00 0.84 0.22 hedged possibility 0.54
s3 We also show that this conclusion holds by a factor of a few when we consider the other measured X-ray states. result 0.95 0.88 0.10 asserted 1.00
s4 Using the correlation of AGILE data on the flaring episodes in 2009 June and July to the hypersoft X-ray state we calculate that the upper limits on the neutrino flux given by IceCube are starting to constrain the hadronic models, which have been introduced to interpret the high-energy emission detected by AGILE. interpretation 0.76 0.91 0.70 asserted 0.95

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.80 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.81.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In this work we give an estimate of the neutrino flux that can be expected from the microquasar Cyg X-3. We calculate the muon neutrino flux expected here on Earth as well as the corresponding number of neutrino events in the IceCube telescope based on the so-called hypersoft X-ray state of Cyg~X-3. If the average emission from Cyg~X-3 over a period of 5 yr were as high as during the used X-ray state, a total of 0.8 events should be observed by the full IceCube telescope. We also show that this conclusion holds by a factor of a few when we consider the other measured X-ray states. Using the correlation of AGILE data on the flaring episodes in 2009 June and July to the hypersoft X-ray state we calculate that the upper limits on the neutrino flux given by IceCube are starting to constrain the hadronic models, which have been introduced to interpret the high-energy emission detected by AGILE.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Cites it as support 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.