Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Tractable Inference for Complex Stochastic Processes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1301.7362 v1 pith:52CLT2YP submitted 2013-01-30 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords statebeliefprocessapproximationapproximationscomplexdynamicerror
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The monitoring and control of any dynamic system depends crucially on the ability to reason about its current status and its future trajectory. In the case of a stochastic system, these tasks typically involve the use of a belief state- a probability distribution over the state of the process at a given point in time. Unfortunately, the state spaces of complex processes are very large, making an explicit representation of a belief state intractable. Even in dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs), where the process itself can be represented compactly, the representation of the belief state is intractable. We investigate the idea of maintaining a compact approximation to the true belief state, and analyze the conditions under which the errors due to the approximations taken over the lifetime of the process do not accumulate to make our answers completely irrelevant. We show that the error in a belief state contracts exponentially as the process evolves. Thus, even with multiple approximations, the error in our process remains bounded indefinitely. We show how the additional structure of a DBN can be used to design our approximation scheme, improving its performance significantly. We demonstrate the applicability of our ideas in the context of a monitoring task, showing that orders of magnitude faster inference can be achieved with only a small degradation in accuracy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Extending Causal Metamodeling to a non-Markovian Queue

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Extends MDBNs to non-Markovian queues via phase-type approximation, enabling accurate PCQs with orders-of-magnitude inference speedup on G/M/1 queue.

  2. How Certain are Uncertainty Estimates? Three Novel Earth Observation Datasets for Benchmarking Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Three new Earth observation benchmark datasets with reference uncertainty values for regression, segmentation, and classification are introduced to evaluate machine learning uncertainty quantification methods.

Pith tools