REVIEW 2 cited by
Further understanding of the non-$D\bar D$ decays of $\psi(3770)$
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We provide details of the study of $\psi(3770)$ non-$D\bar D$ decays into $VP$, where $V$ and $P$ denote light vector meson and pseudoscalar meson, respectively. We find that the electromagnetic (EM) interaction plays little role in these processes, while the strong interaction dominates. The strong interaction can be separated into two parts, i.e. the short-distance part probing the wave function at origin and the long-distance part reflecting the soft gluon exchanged dynamics. The long-distance part is thus described by the intermediate charmed meson loops. We show that the transition of $\psi(3770)\to VP$ can be related to $\psi(3686)\to VP$ such that the parameters in our model can be constrained by comparing the different parts in $\psi(3770)\to VP$ to those in $\psi(3686)\to VP$. Our quantitative results confirm the findings of [Zhang {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 172001 (2009)] that the OZI-rule-evading long-distance strong interaction via the IML plays an important role in $\psi(3770)$ decays, and could be a key towards a full understanding of the mysterious $\psi(3770)$ non-$D\bar{D}$ decay mechanism.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Two-body Hidden Charm Decays of $D$ Wave Charmonia
Using a meson-loop model calibrated to psi(3770) to J/psi eta, the paper predicts Gamma(psi2(3823) to J/psi eta) = 29.6 keV and smaller eta_c omega and psi3(3842) rates.
-
Unquenched Charmonium and Beyond
This Lanzhou-group review argues that coupled-channel (unquenched) effects, not exotic constituents, are the common thread explaining charmonium anomalies from the rho-pi puzzle to the Y-problem states.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.