Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Dark matter halo properties from galaxy-galaxy lensing

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · Submitted 25 Mar 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We find luminosity scaling relations of \sigma_{red} ~ L^{0.24+-0.03} for the red lens sample, \sigma_{blue} ~ L^{0.23+-0.03} for blue lenses and \sigma ~ L^{0.29+-0.02} for the combined lens sample with zeropoints of \sigma*_{red}=162+-2 km/s, \sigma*_{blue}=115+-3 km/s and \sigma*=135+-2 km/s at a chosen reference luminosity L*_{r'} = 1.6 \times 10^10 h^{-2} L_{r',sun}.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1303.6287 (version 2)
Pith IDTIDATJCP, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationF. Brimioulle, J. Snigula, M. Lerchster, R. Bender, S. Seitz. "Dark matter halo properties from galaxy-galaxy lensing." arXiv:1303.6287 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/TIDATJCP
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,983 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.29 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.10 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present results for a galaxy-galaxy lensing study based on imaging data from the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey Wide. From a 12 million object multi-colour catalogue for 124 deg^2 of photometric data in the u*g'r'i'z' filters we compute photometric redshifts (with a scatter of \sigma_{\Delta z/(1+z)} = 0.033 and an outlier rate of \eta=2.0 per cent for i'<=22.5) and extract galaxy shapes down to i'=24.0. We select a sample of lenses and sources with 0.05 < z_d <= 1 and 0.05 < z_s <= 2. We fit three different galaxy halo profiles to the lensing signal, a singular isothermal sphere (SIS), a truncated isothermal sphere (BBS) and a universal density profile (NFW). We derive velocity dispersions by fitting an SIS out to 100 h^{-1} kpc to the excess surface mass density \Delta\Sigma and perform maximum likelihood analyses out to a maximum scale of 2 h^{-1} Mpc to obtain halo parameters and scaling relations. We find luminosity scaling relations of \sigma_{red} ~ L^{0.24+-0.03} for the red lens sample, \sigma_{blue} ~ L^{0.23+-0.03} for blue lenses and \sigma ~ L^{0.29+-0.02} for the combined lens sample with zeropoints of \sigma*_{red}=162+-2 km/s, \sigma*_{blue}=115+-3 km/s and \sigma*=135+-2 km/s at a chosen reference luminosity L*_{r'} = 1.6 \times 10^10 h^{-2} L_{r',sun}. The steeper slope for the combined sample is due to the different zeropoints of the blue and red lenses and the fact that blue lenses dominate at low luminosities and red lenses at high luminosities. The mean effective redshifts for the lens samples are <z_{red}>=0.28 for red lenses, <z_{blue}>=0.35 for blue lenses and <z>=0.34 for the combined lens sample.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present results for a galaxy-galaxy lensing study based on imaging data from the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey Wide. contribution 0.94 0.88 0.02 asserted 0.98
s1 From a 12 million object multi-colour catalogue for 124 deg^2 of photometric data in the u*g'r'i'z' filters we compute photometric redshifts (with a scatter of \sigma_{\Delta z/(1+z)} = 0.033 and an outlier rate of \eta=2.0 per cent for i'<=22.5) and extract galaxy shapes down to i'=24.0. method 1.00 0.96 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 We select a sample of lenses and sources with 0.05 < z_d <= 1 and 0.05 < z_s <= 2. method 0.99 0.93 0.02 asserted 0.96
s3 We fit three different galaxy halo profiles to the lensing signal, a singular isothermal sphere (SIS), a truncated isothermal sphere (BBS) and a universal density profile (NFW). method 0.99 0.95 0.03 asserted 0.97
s4 We derive velocity dispersions by fitting an SIS out to 100 h^{-1} kpc to the excess surface mass density \Delta\Sigma and perform maximum likelihood analyses out to a maximum scale of 2 h^{-1} Mpc to obtain halo parameters and scaling relations. method 1.00 0.97 0.04 asserted 0.99
s5 We find luminosity scaling relations of \sigma_{red} ~ L^{0.24+-0.03} for the red lens sample, \sigma_{blue} ~ L^{0.23+-0.03} for blue lenses and \sigma ~ L^{0.29+-0.02} for the combined lens sample with zeropoints of \sigma*_{red}=162+-2 km/s, \sigma*_{blue}=115+-3 km/s and \sigma*=135+-2 km/s at a chosen reference luminosity L*_{r'} = 1.6 \times 10^10 h^{-2} L_{r',sun}. result 1.00 0.97 0.51 asserted 1.00
s6 The steeper slope for the combined sample is due to the different zeropoints of the blue and red lenses and the fact that blue lenses dominate at low luminosities and red lenses at high luminosities. interpretation 1.00 0.84 0.11 asserted 1.00
s7 The mean effective redshifts for the lens samples are <z_{red}>=0.28 for red lenses, <z_{blue}>=0.35 for blue lenses and <z>=0.34 for the combined lens sample. result 1.00 0.94 0.05 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.84.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present results for a galaxy-galaxy lensing study based on imaging data from the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey Wide. From a 12 million object multi-colour catalogue for 124 deg^2 of photometric data in the u*g'r'i'z' filters we compute photometric redshifts (with a scatter of \sigma_{\Delta z/(1+z)} = 0.033 and an outlier rate of \eta=2.0 per cent for i'<=22.5) and extract galaxy shapes down to i'=24.0. We select a sample of lenses and sources with 0.05 < z_d <= 1 and 0.05 < z_s <= 2. We fit three different galaxy halo profiles to the lensing signal, a singular isothermal sphere (SIS), a truncated isothermal sphere (BBS) and a universal density profile (NFW). We derive velocity dispersions by fitting an SIS out to 100 h^{-1} kpc to the excess surface mass density \Delta\Sigma and perform maximum likelihood analyses out to a maximum scale of 2 h^{-1} Mpc to obtain halo parameters and scaling relations. We find luminosity scaling relations of \sigma_{red} ~ L^{0.24+-0.03} for the red lens sample, \sigma_{blue} ~ L^{0.23+-0.03} for blue lenses and \sigma ~ L^{0.29+-0.02} for the combined lens sample with zeropoints of \sigma*_{red}=162+-2 km/s, \sigma*_{blue}=115+-3 km/s and \sigma*=135+-2 km/s at a chosen reference luminosity L*_{r'} = 1.6 \times 10^10 h^{-2} L_{r',sun}. The steeper slope for the combined sample is due to the different zeropoints of the blue and red lenses and the fact that blue lenses dominate at low luminosities and red lenses at high luminosities. The mean effective redshifts for the lens samples are <z_{red}>=0.28 for red lenses, <z_{blue}>=0.35 for blue lenses and <z>=0.34 for the combined lens sample.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

5 arXiv papers cite this in 7 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 6 sentences without a confident label

Uses its data or values 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.