RECORD
ARGOS IV: The Kinematics of the Milky Way Bulge
Astrophysics of Galaxies · Submitted 26 Mar 2013
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We do not exclude an underlying merger generated bulge component but our results favour bulge formation from instabilities in the early thin disk.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We present the kinematic results from our ARGOS spectroscopic survey of the Galactic bulge of the Milky Way. Our aim is to understand the formation of the Galactic bulge. We examine the kinematics of about 17,400 stars in the bulge located within 3.5 kpc of the Galactic centre, identified from the 28,000 star ARGOS survey. We aim to determine if the formation of the bulge has been internally driven from disk instabilities as suggested by its boxy shape, or if mergers have played a significant role as expected from Lambda CDM simulations. From our velocity measurements across latitudes b = -5 deg, -7.5 deg and -10 deg we find the bulge to be a cylindrically rotating system that transitions smoothly out into the disk. Within the bulge, we find a kinematically distinct metal-poor population ([Fe/H] < -1.0) that is not rotating cylindrically. The 5% of our stars with [Fe/H] < -1.0 are a slowly rotating spheroidal population, which we believe are stars of the metal weak thick disk and halo which presently lie in the inner Galaxy. The kinematics of the two bulge components that we identified in ARGOS paper III (mean [Fe/H] = -0.25 and [Fe/H] = +0.15, respectively) demonstrate that they are likely to share a common formation origin and are distinct from the more metal poor populations of the thick disk and halo which are colocated inside the bulge. We do not exclude an underlying merger generated bulge component but our results favour bulge formation from instabilities in the early thin disk.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We present the kinematic results from our ARGOS spectroscopic survey of the Galactic bulge of the Milky Way. | contribution 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.03 | asserted 0.96 |
| s1 | Our aim is to understand the formation of the Galactic bulge. | background 0.65 | 0.16 | 0.02 | asserted 0.63 |
| s2 | We examine the kinematics of about 17,400 stars in the bulge located within 3.5 kpc of the Galactic centre, identified from the 28,000 star ARGOS survey. | contribution 0.62 | 0.91 | 0.03 | asserted 0.96 |
| s3 | We aim to determine if the formation of the bulge has been internally driven from disk instabilities as suggested by its boxy shape, or if mergers have played a significant role as expected from Lambda CDM simulations. | background 0.45 | 0.11 | 0.03 | hedged possibility 0.82 |
| s4 | From our velocity measurements across latitudes b = -5 deg, -7.5 deg and -10 deg we find the bulge to be a cylindrically rotating system that transitions smoothly out into the disk. | result 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.38 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | Within the bulge, we find a kinematically distinct metal-poor population ([Fe/H] < -1.0) that is not rotating cylindrically. | result 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.11 | asserted 1.00 |
| s6 | The 5% of our stars with [Fe/H] < -1.0 are a slowly rotating spheroidal population, which we believe are stars of the metal weak thick disk and halo which presently lie in the inner Galaxy. | interpretation 0.76 | 0.89 | 0.09 | hedged possibility 0.57 |
| s7 | The kinematics of the two bulge components that we identified in ARGOS paper III (mean [Fe/H] = -0.25 and [Fe/H] = +0.15, respectively) demonstrate that they are likely to share a common formation origin and are distinct from the more metal poor populations of the thick disk and halo which are colocated inside the bulge. | interpretation 0.78 | 0.90 | 0.23 | hedged possibility 0.84 |
| s8 | We do not exclude an underlying merger generated bulge component but our results favour bulge formation from instabilities in the early thin disk. | interpretation 0.99 | 0.77 | 0.58 | hedged possibility 0.92 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We present the kinematic results from our ARGOS spectroscopic survey of the Galactic bulge of the Milky Way. Our aim is to understand the formation of the Galactic bulge. We examine the kinematics of about 17,400 stars in the bulge located within 3.5 kpc of the Galactic centre, identified from the 28,000 star ARGOS survey. We aim to determine if the formation of the bulge has been internally driven from disk instabilities as suggested by its boxy shape, or if mergers have played a significant role as expected from Lambda CDM simulations. From our velocity measurements across latitudes b = -5 deg, -7.5 deg and -10 deg we find the bulge to be a cylindrically rotating system that transitions smoothly out into the disk. Within the bulge, we find a kinematically distinct metal-poor population ([Fe/H] < -1.0) that is not rotating cylindrically. The 5% of our stars with [Fe/H] < -1.0 are a slowly rotating spheroidal population, which we believe are stars of the metal weak thick disk and halo which presently lie in the inner Galaxy. The kinematics of the two bulge components that we identified in ARGOS paper III (mean [Fe/H] = -0.25 and [Fe/H] = +0.15, respectively) demonstrate that they are likely to share a common formation origin and are distinct from the more metal poor populations of the thick disk and halo which are colocated inside the bulge. We do not exclude an underlying merger generated bulge component but our results favour bulge formation from instabilities in the early thin disk.
Human review
References
How later papers used it
45 later papers cite it
2 papers by the same authors are listed below: 1 used its method or tool, 1 used its data or values and 1 compared its own results with it. 1 of them appears under more than one label.
Uses its method or tool 1 of 3 papers with this label · 1 by the same authors
By the same authors
-
Followed this paper in defining four metallicity bins of width 0.5, called A to D.
Chemodynamical Modelling of the Galactic Bulge and Bar (2017) (same authors) · 0.91 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
Uses its data or values 1 of 8 papers with this label · 1 by the same authors
By the same authors
-
Compared its velocity and velocity dispersion for stars in three metallicity bins with those of Milky Way bulge stars of corresponding metallicities using data from the ARGOS survey.
Chemodynamics of barred galaxies in cosmological simulations: On the Milky Way's quiescent merger history and in-situ bulge (2019) (same authors) · 0.84 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
Compares with it 1 of 7 papers with this label · 1 by the same authors
By the same authors
-
Found that bin A stars give the main mass support to the bar, although this paper found bin B to be the most populated metallicity bin in the data.
Chemodynamical Modelling of the Galactic Bulge and Bar (2017) (same authors) · 0.84 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
How the literature uses it
What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites
What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label
Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
-
The stellar parameters were derived from a $χ^2$ comparison with synthetic spectra generated in the 1D Local Thermal Equilibrium (LTE) stellar synthesis program MOOG [ref] using the Castelli/Kurucz model atmospheres [ref] .
New Grids of ATLAS9 Model Atmospheres · Observations and Strategy · 1.00
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.