Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1305.5165 v2 pith:4WMTCA5C submitted 2013-05-22 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.CO

Is the metallicity of the progenitor of long gamma-ray bursts really low?

classification astro-ph.HE astro-ph.CO
keywords formationlgrbsratestarmetallicityhistorymodelsodot
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Observations of long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs) offer a unique opportunity for probing the cosmic star formation history, although whether or not LGRB rates are biased tracers of star formation rate history is highly debated. Based on an extensive sample of LGRBs compiled by Robertson & Ellis (2012), we analyze various models of star formation rate and the possible effect of the evolution of cosmic metallicity under the assumption that LGRBs tend to occur in low-metallicity galaxies. The models of star formation rate tested in this work include empirical fits from observational data as well as a self-consistent model calculated in the framework of the hierarchical structure formation. Comparing with the observational data, we find a relatively higher metallicity cut of $Z\gtrsim0.6Z_{\odot}$ for the empirical fits and no metallicity cut for the self-consistent model. These results imply that there is no strong metallicity preference for the host galaxy of LGRBs, in contrast to previous work which suggest a cut of $Z\sim0.1-0.3Z_{\odot}$, and that the inferred dependencies of LGRBs on their host galaxy properties are strongly related to the specific models of star formation rate. Furthermore, a significant fraction of LGRBs occur in small dark matter halos down to $3\times10^{8}\,\mathrm{M_{\odot}}$ can provide an alternative explanation for the discrepancy between the star formation rate history and LGRB rate history.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Gamma-ray bursts reveal the history and faint contributors of cosmic reionization

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    Long gamma-ray bursts imply a higher cosmic star formation rate density at z>6 than galaxy surveys detect, sufficient to drive reionization with moderate ionizing efficiency and escape fraction, implying a large popul...