REVIEW 1 cited by
Fourier series of atomic radial distribution functions: A molecular fingerprint for machine learning models of quantum chemical properties
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We introduce a fingerprint representation of molecules based on a Fourier series of atomic radial distribution functions. This fingerprint is unique (except for chirality), continuous, and differentiable with respect to atomic coordinates and nuclear charges. It is invariant with respect to translation, rotation, and nuclear permutation, and requires no pre-conceived knowledge about chemical bonding, topology, or electronic orbitals. As such it meets many important criteria for a good molecular representation, suggesting its usefulness for machine learning models of molecular properties trained across chemical compound space. To assess the performance of this new descriptor we have trained machine learning models of molecular enthalpies of atomization for training sets with up to 10k organic molecules, drawn at random from a published set of 134k organic molecules. We validate the descriptor on all remaining molecules of the 134k set. For a training set of 5k molecules the fingerprint descriptor achieves a mean absolute error of 8.0 kcal/mol, respectively. This is slightly worse than the performance attained using the Coulomb matrix, another popular alternative, reaching 6.2 kcal/mol for the same training and test sets.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Machine learning the computational cost of quantum chemistry
Kernel-ridge models on molecular fingerprints predict quantum-chemistry job runtimes well enough to improve simulated HPC scheduling and reduce CPU overhead by 10 to 90 percent.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.