Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Muon reconstruction and identification with the Run II D0 detector

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
D0 Collaboration

High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 19 Jul 2013

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We discuss the performance of these methods, how it is measured using D0 data, and how it is properly modeled by the D0 simulation program.

how it is stated · asserted 0.88 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1307.5202 (version 2)
Pith IDH7Q23BMX, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationD0 Collaboration. "Muon reconstruction and identification with the Run II D0 detector." arXiv:1307.5202 (2013). https://pith.science/paper/H7Q23BMX
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,403 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.21 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.08 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present an overview of the muon reconstruction and identification methods employed by the D0 Collaboration to analyze the Run II (2001-2011) ppbar data of the Fermilab Tevatron collider at sqrt s = 1.96 TeV. We discuss the performance of these methods, how it is measured using D0 data, and how it is properly modeled by the D0 simulation program. In its pseudorapidity acceptance, eta< 2, the muon system identifies high-pT muons (pT>10 GeV) with efficiencies ranging from 72% to 89%. Muons tracks are reconstructed in the D0 central tracking system with efficiencies ranging from 85% to 92% and with a typical relative momentum resolution of 10% for pT = 40 GeV. Isolation criteria reject multijet background with efficiencies of 87% to 99%.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present an overview of the muon reconstruction and identification methods employed by the D0 Collaboration to analyze the Run II (2001-2011) ppbar data of the Fermilab Tevatron collider at sqrt s = 1.96 TeV. contribution 0.95 0.66 0.10 asserted 0.96
s1 We discuss the performance of these methods, how it is measured using D0 data, and how it is properly modeled by the D0 simulation program. method 0.55 0.84 0.06 asserted 0.88
s2 In its pseudorapidity acceptance, eta< 2, the muon system identifies high-pT muons (pT>10 GeV) with efficiencies ranging from 72% to 89%. result 0.99 0.87 0.10 asserted 1.00
s3 Muons tracks are reconstructed in the D0 central tracking system with efficiencies ranging from 85% to 92% and with a typical relative momentum resolution of 10% for pT = 40 GeV. result 0.98 0.88 0.06 asserted 1.00
s4 Isolation criteria reject multijet background with efficiencies of 87% to 99%. result 0.79 0.85 0.07 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.73 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.74.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present an overview of the muon reconstruction and identification methods employed by the D0 Collaboration to analyze the Run II (2001-2011) ppbar data of the Fermilab Tevatron collider at sqrt s = 1.96 TeV. We discuss the performance of these methods, how it is measured using D0 data, and how it is properly modeled by the D0 simulation program. In its pseudorapidity acceptance, eta< 2, the muon system identifies high-pT muons (pT>10 GeV) with efficiencies ranging from 72% to 89%. Muons tracks are reconstructed in the D0 central tracking system with efficiencies ranging from 85% to 92% and with a typical relative momentum resolution of 10% for pT = 40 GeV. Isolation criteria reject multijet background with efficiencies of 87% to 99%.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

How the literature uses it

6 arXiv papers cite this in 6 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.