REVIEW 1 cited by
Payoff Performance of Fictitious Play
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We investigate how well continuous-time fictitious play in two-player games performs in terms of average payoff, particularly compared to Nash equilibrium payoff. We show that in many games, fictitious play outperforms Nash equilibrium on average or even at all times, and moreover that any game is linearly equivalent to one in which this is the case. Conversely, we provide conditions under which Nash equilibrium payoff dominates fictitious play payoff. A key step in our analysis is to show that fictitious play dynamics asymptotically converges the set of coarse correlated equilibria (a fact which is implicit in the literature).
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Learnable Mixed Nash Equilibria are Collectively Rational
A mixed Nash equilibrium that is locally uniformly stable under uncoupled learning dynamics must be weakly Pareto optimal, and uniform stability controls last-iterate convergence of smoothed best-response dynamics.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.