REVIEW 1 cited by
Kwee-van Woerden method: To use or not to use?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The trustworthiness of orbital period analyses of eclipsing binaries strictly depends on the correctness of the observed mid-eclipse time determination, as well the reliability of its uncertainty estimation. The majority of them has been determined by means of the Kwee-van Woerden method (KWM). There are also other possibilities: to use physical models of eclipsing binaries or light curve templates and to determine mid-eclipse times using the least square method (LSM). We compared results yielded by both methods by means of a computer simulation on the synthetic model of AR\,Aur primary minimum. Minima times determined by the KWM and the exact LSM approach are nearly the same, while the scatter of LSM times is always smaller than the scatter of KWM times. KWM uncertainties are systematically underestimated. We think that the time is ripe for the Kwee-van Woerden method to retire.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The new compact triple system: discovery of bright third star around contact binary using LAMOST-MRS spectra and photometry
J04+25 is a hierarchical triple: a contact binary orbited by a brighter third star on a 941.40-day, slightly eccentric orbit, with projected masses of about 1.05 solar masses for the inner pair and 0.90 solar masses f...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.