Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Comparative Study on Linguistic Feature Selection in Sentiment Polarity Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1311.0833 v1 pith:2XL3MVWI submitted 2013-11-04 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords classificationfeatureslinguisticpolaritysentimentcomparativedifferentfind
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sentiment polarity classification is perhaps the most widely studied topic. It classifies an opinionated document as expressing a positive or negative opinion. In this paper, using movie review dataset, we perform a comparative study with different single kind linguistic features and the combinations of these features. We find that the classic topic-based classifier(Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine) do not perform as well on sentiment polarity classification. And we find that with some combination of different linguistic features, the classification accuracy can be boosted a lot. We give some reasonable explanations about these boosting outcomes.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CL-ISR: A Contrastive Learning and Implicit Stance Reasoning Framework for Misleading Text Detection on Social Media

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    CL-ISR claims F1 improvements on FakeNewsNet, PHEME, and Weibo-Misinfo by combining contrastive learning with implicit stance reasoning.

Pith tools