Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Dark Matter or Neutrino recoil? Interpretation of Recent Experimental Results

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1311.5764 v1 pith:XZMGY2CR submitted 2013-11-22 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords interpretationmodelneutrinoresultsanomaliesdarkdetectorsexperiment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The elastic nuclear recoil signal, being under intense scrutiny by multiple underground experiments, can be interpreted either as coming from the interaction of nuclei with WIMP dark matter or from the scattering of new species of MeV-energy neutrinos. The most promising model for the latter case is a neutrino $\nu_b$ that interacts with baryon number, and with a flux sourced by the oscillations of regular solar $^8$B neutrinos. We re-analyze this model in light of the latest experimental results. In contrast to the light-DM interpretation of various tentative positive signals (anomalies) that is now seriously challenged by the negative results of the LUX experiment, the neutrino interpretation remains a viable explanation to most of the anomalies. Considering future prospects, we show that the superCDMS experiment alone, when equipped with Ge and Si detectors, will be able to detect $\nu_b$ and discriminate the model from a light DM interpretation. In addition, we also provide the forecast for the new CRESST-II run that now operates with new detectors and diminished backgrounds.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools