Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The physical properties of Fermi BL Lac objects jets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1401.5552 v1 pith:O2DWMHU7 submitted 2014-01-22 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.CO

The physical properties of Fermi BL Lac objects jets

classification astro-ph.HE astro-ph.CO
keywords primehblsiblsjetslacsmodelenergygamma
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the physical properties of BL Lac objects (BL Lacs) jets by modeling the quasi-simultaneous spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of 22 {\it Fermi} BL Lac objects in the frame of a simple one-zone synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) model. We obtained the best-fit model parameters and their uncertainties for each BL Lac object through the $\chi^2$-minimization procedure and discussed their implications on the physical processes. The modeling results show that the one-zone SSC model can successfully fit the SEDs of high-synchrotron-peaked BL Lacs (HBLs) and intermediate-synchrotron-peaked BL Lacs (IBLs), but fails to explain the SEDs of low-synchrotron-peaked BL Lacs (LBLs). The statistical analysis results for model parameters are summarized as follows. (1) No correlation is found between magnetic field ($B$) and the broken energy of relativistic electrons distribution ($\gamma^{\prime}_{\rm b}$) for HBLs and IBLs, but there are inverse correlations between $\gamma^{\prime}_{\rm b}$ and the radius of emitting blob ($R^{\prime}_{\rm b}$) as well as the electrons number $K^{\prime}_{\rm e}$ for HBLs and IBLs. It's therefore concluded that the variation of $\gamma^{\prime}_{\rm b}$ is mainly caused by that of $R^{\prime}_{\rm b}$ rather than $B$ for HBLs and IBLs. (2) The Poynting flux in jets can not account for the observed radiations since the power in Poynting flux is smaller than the radiative power, and the cold protons could be the primary energy carrier in the jets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.