REVIEW 3 cited by
A Guide to Designing Future Ground-based CMB Experiments
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
In this follow-up work to the High Energy Physics Community Summer Study 2013 (HEP CSS 2013, a.k.a. Snowmass), we explore the scientific capabilities of a future Stage-IV Cosmic Microwave Background polarization experiment (CMB-S4) under various assumptions on detector count, resolution, and sky coverage. We use the Fisher matrix technique to calculate the expected uncertainties in cosmological parameters in $\nu \Lambda$CDM that are especially relevant to the physics of fundamental interactions, including neutrino masses, effective number of relativistic species, dark-energy equation of state, dark-matter annihilation, and inflationary parameters. To further chart the landscape of future cosmology probes, we include forecasted results from the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) signal as measured by DESI to constrain parameters that would benefit from low redshift information. We find the following best 1-sigma constraints: $\sigma$ constraints: $\sigma(M_{\nu})= 15$ meV, $\sigma(N_{\rm eff})= 0.0156$, Dark energy Figure of Merit = 303, $\sigma(p_{ann})= 0.00588\times3\times10^{-26}$ cm$^3$/s/GeV, $\sigma(\Omega_K)= 0.00074$, $\sigma(n_s)= 0.00110$, $\sigma(\alpha_s)= 0.00145$, and $\sigma(r)= 0.00009$. We also detail the dependences of the parameter constraints on detector count, resolution, and sky coverage.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Beyond thermal approximations: Precise cosmological bounds on Axion-Like Particles
Solving the momentum-dependent Boltzmann equation and propagating the exact non-thermal ALP spectrum into CMB analyses yields 95% limits f_a>1.63e6 GeV (e), 9.41e6 GeV (mu), 8.06e4 GeV (tau), and g_a_gamma<1.98e-8 GeV^-1.
-
Stage IV CMB forecasts for warm inflation
Future CMB surveys are forecast to tighten the dissipation parameter of quartic warm inflation by up to an order of magnitude and to exclude the cubic dissipation model under a null tensor-to-scalar ratio.
-
Starobinsky Inflation and the Latest CMB Data: A Subtle Tension?
When implemented directly in CLASS, Starobinsky inflation remains consistent with Planck+ACT+BAO data at the 2σ level, but the inferred e-fold range sits above the reheating-motivated window, and a fitted R³ correctio...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.