Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Inequality for Burkholder's martingale transform

Analysis of PDEs · Submitted 19 Feb 2014

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We find the sharp constant $C=C(\tau,p, \mathbb{E}G, \mathbb{E}F)$ of the following inequality $\|(G^{2}+ \tau^{2} F^{2})^{1/2} \|_{p} \leq C \|F\|_{p},$ where $G$ is the transform of a martingale $F$ under a predictable sequence $\varepsilon$ with absolute value 1, $1<p< 2$, and $\tau$ is any real number.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1402.4751 (version 2)
Pith IDVX6F2KLA, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationPaata Ivanisvili. "Inequality for Burkholder's martingale transform." arXiv:1402.4751 (2014). https://pith.science/paper/VX6F2KLA
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 1,857 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.24 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.82 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We find the sharp constant $C=C(\tau,p, \mathbb{E}G, \mathbb{E}F)$ of the following inequality $\|(G^{2}+ \tau^{2} F^{2})^{1/2} \|_{p} \leq C \|F\|_{p},$ where $G$ is the transform of a martingale $F$ under a predictable sequence $\varepsilon$ with absolute value 1, $1<p< 2$, and $\tau$ is any real number.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We find the sharp constant $C=C(\tau,p, \mathbb{E}G, \mathbb{E}F)$ of the following inequality $\|(G^{2}+ \tau^{2} F^{2})^{1/2} \|_{p} \leq C \|F\|_{p},$ where $G$ is the transform of a martingale $F$ under a predictable sequence $\varepsilon$ with absolute value 1, $1<p< 2$, and $\tau$ is any real number. result 0.62 0.95 0.91 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We find the sharp constant $C=C(\tau,p, \mathbb{E}G, \mathbb{E}F)$ of the following inequality $\|(G^{2}+ \tau^{2} F^{2})^{1/2} \|_{p} \leq C \|F\|_{p},$ where $G$ is the transform of a martingale $F$ under a predictable sequence $\varepsilon$ with absolute value 1, $1<p< 2$, and $\tau$ is any real number.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Cites it as background 1 paper
  • See also the works of Arnold [ref] for relations with contact geometry, the book of Ovsienko and Tabachnikov [ref] for projective geometric aspects, Angenent [ref] for connections with mean curvature flow, which are also discussed in [ref] , and Ivanisvili et al. [ref] for applications to the study of Bellman functions.

    Boundary torsion and convex caps of locally convex surfaces · Introduction · 1.00

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.