Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On the Helicity of Open Magnetic Fields

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1404.3897 v1 pith:EVKUKGHZ submitted 2014-04-15 astro-ph.SR physics.flu-dynphysics.plasm-phphysics.space-ph

classification astro-ph.SRphysics.flu-dynphysics.plasm-phphysics.space-ph
keywords helicityfieldmagneticchoicefieldsgaugeopenreference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We reconsider the topological interpretation of magnetic helicity for magnetic fields in open domains, and relate this to the relative helicity. Specifically, our domains stretch between two parallel planes, and each of these ends may be magnetically open. It is demonstrated that, while the magnetic helicity is gauge-dependent, its value in any gauge may be physically interpreted as the average winding number among all pairs of field lines with respect to some orthonormal frame field. In fact, the choice of gauge is equivalent to the choice of reference field in the relative helicity, meaning that the magnetic helicity is no less physically meaningful. We prove that a particular gauge always measures the winding with respect to a fixed frame, and propose that this is normally the best choice. For periodic fields, this choice is equivalent to measuring relative helicity with respect to a potential reference field. But for aperiodic fields, we show that the potential field can be twisted. We prove by construction that there always exists a possible untwisted reference field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools