Pith. Sign in

RECORD

G-AMA: Sparse Gaussian graphical model estimation via alternating minimization

Computation · Submitted 13 May 2014

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The methodology is demonstrated on both simulated and real datasets to illustrate its superior performance over recently proposed methods.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1405.3034 (version 2)
Pith IDX5ITFUKZ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationBala Rajaratnam, Onkar Dalal. "G-AMA: Sparse Gaussian graphical model estimation via alternating minimization." arXiv:1405.3034 (2014). https://pith.science/paper/X5ITFUKZ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,571 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.10 · controlled comparison 0.29 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.12 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Several methods have been recently proposed for estimating sparse Gaussian graphical models using $\ell_{1}$ regularization on the inverse covariance matrix. Despite recent advances, contemporary applications require methods that are even faster in order to handle ill-conditioned high dimensional modern day datasets. In this paper, we propose a new method, G-AMA, to solve the sparse inverse covariance estimation problem using Alternating Minimization Algorithm (AMA), that effectively works as a proximal gradient algorithm on the dual problem. Our approach has several novel advantages over existing methods. First, we demonstrate that G-AMA is faster than the previous best algorithms by many orders of magnitude and is thus an ideal approach for modern high throughput applications. Second, global linear convergence of G-AMA is demonstrated rigorously, underscoring its good theoretical properties. Third, the dual algorithm operates on the covariance matrix, and thus easily facilitates incorporating additional constraints on pairwise/marginal relationships between feature pairs based on domain specific knowledge. Over and above estimating a sparse inverse covariance matrix, we also illustrate how to (1) incorporate constraints on the (bivariate) correlations and, (2) incorporate equality (equisparsity) or linear constraints between individual inverse covariance elements. Fourth, we also show that G-AMA is better adept at handling extremely ill-conditioned problems, as is often the case with real data. The methodology is demonstrated on both simulated and real datasets to illustrate its superior performance over recently proposed methods.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Several methods have been recently proposed for estimating sparse Gaussian graphical models using $\ell_{1}$ regularization on the inverse covariance matrix. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Despite recent advances, contemporary applications require methods that are even faster in order to handle ill-conditioned high dimensional modern day datasets. gap 0.93 0.06 0.03 asserted 0.99
s2 In this paper, we propose a new method, G-AMA, to solve the sparse inverse covariance estimation problem using Alternating Minimization Algorithm (AMA), that effectively works as a proximal gradient algorithm on the dual problem. contribution 0.75 0.89 0.19 asserted 1.00
s3 Our approach has several novel advantages over existing methods. contribution 0.98 0.37 0.07 asserted 0.98
s4 First, we demonstrate that G-AMA is faster than the previous best algorithms by many orders of magnitude and is thus an ideal approach for modern high throughput applications. result 0.87 0.90 0.39 asserted 1.00
s5 Second, global linear convergence of G-AMA is demonstrated rigorously, underscoring its good theoretical properties. result 0.58 0.95 0.11 asserted 1.00
s6 Third, the dual algorithm operates on the covariance matrix, and thus easily facilitates incorporating additional constraints on pairwise/marginal relationships between feature pairs based on domain specific knowledge. contribution 0.94 0.76 0.06 asserted 0.98
s7 Over and above estimating a sparse inverse covariance matrix, we also illustrate how to (1) incorporate constraints on the (bivariate) correlations and, (2) incorporate equality (equisparsity) or linear constraints between individual inverse covariance elements. contribution 0.95 0.91 0.07 asserted 1.00
s8 Fourth, we also show that G-AMA is better adept at handling extremely ill-conditioned problems, as is often the case with real data. result 0.54 0.89 0.10 asserted 1.00
s9 The methodology is demonstrated on both simulated and real datasets to illustrate its superior performance over recently proposed methods. result 0.69 0.93 0.26 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.90.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Several methods have been recently proposed for estimating sparse Gaussian graphical models using $\ell_{1}$ regularization on the inverse covariance matrix. Despite recent advances, contemporary applications require methods that are even faster in order to handle ill-conditioned high dimensional modern day datasets. In this paper, we propose a new method, G-AMA, to solve the sparse inverse covariance estimation problem using Alternating Minimization Algorithm (AMA), that effectively works as a proximal gradient algorithm on the dual problem. Our approach has several novel advantages over existing methods. First, we demonstrate that G-AMA is faster than the previous best algorithms by many orders of magnitude and is thus an ideal approach for modern high throughput applications. Second, global linear convergence of G-AMA is demonstrated rigorously, underscoring its good theoretical properties. Third, the dual algorithm operates on the covariance matrix, and thus easily facilitates incorporating additional constraints on pairwise/marginal relationships between feature pairs based on domain specific knowledge. Over and above estimating a sparse inverse covariance matrix, we also illustrate how to (1) incorporate constraints on the (bivariate) correlations and, (2) incorporate equality (equisparsity) or linear constraints between individual inverse covariance elements. Fourth, we also show that G-AMA is better adept at handling extremely ill-conditioned problems, as is often the case with real data. The methodology is demonstrated on both simulated and real datasets to illustrate its superior performance over recently proposed methods.

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 5 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Cites it as background 2 papers

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Builds on 1 paper
Compares with 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.